plot exist ''aam rasta' after which plot of Guru Prakash. When Tulsi Ram from whom plaintiff purchased the plot from Ramkali, wife ... took place on agriculture land. Common passages left in course of plotting because common property could not be alienated by Aziz Ahmad Khan treating himself
common area shown as parking place by dotted line in the plaint map and that the defendant be restrained from encroaching upon any other common ... Ground Floor having covered area admeasuring 37.16 Sq. constructed at freehold plot No. 179 Block R.N. Ratan Lal Nagar Kanpur Nagar known
question was recorded in the name of common ancestor Kali Din, therefore, the addition of a few plots in the subsequent years will not deprive ... parties. Kali Din was the common ancestor of the petitioners and the respondents. The plot in dispute was recorded in the Khatauni of basis year
said plot, two plots, namely, plot no.1182 and 1184 exist, which are marked as Banjar and, thereafter, plot no.1180 and 1181 exist ... then the plot of the petitioner i.e. plot no.1179 is situated. There is considerable distance between plot no.737 and plot no.1179
short the Act, 1950) relating to the same plot i.e. Plot No.518 and the house constructed on the same, therefore, the writ petition ... being decided by a common order.
It appears from the records that the total area of Plot No.518 is 0.246 Hectares. A report
that on southern side of plot no. 157-A, plot no. 157-B is situated and on western side plot no. 160 is situated ... with plot no. 160 and Peer Baksh Marhoom with plot no. 157-B, which is shown to be situated on southern side of plot
mandamus directing the respondents to remove the encroachment of common pathway situated at plot no.248 in village Ahiro Parashurampur, (Anguli), Tehsil Shahganj, District Jaunpur
writ petition is that the respondents have encroached upon common pathway adjacent to the bhumidhari plot of the petitioner.
The petitioner has a remedy
predecessors were recorded in any of the three Settlements on the said plot no.13. It was the predecessors of the recorded tenure holders ... during pendency of the Revision. Plot no.14 as mentioned in the writ petition in paragraph-3, was originally plot no.13 of Basic year
that both the sides belong to common family and dispute took place on account of division of agricultural plot between them.Applicant is alleged
