Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 327 (0.01 seconds)

Skyline Builders vs Sheela George on 30 April, 2010

VISWANATHAN      : JUDICIAL MEMBER   The above 4 appeals are preferred from the common order dated 19th May 2003 passed by CDRF, Ernakulam ... opposite party M/s Skyline Builders in providing amenities and common facilities to the plots and the villas thereon constructed by the opposite party
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Chandran vs M/S Skyline Builders, on 30 April, 2010

VISWANATHAN      : JUDICIAL MEMBER   The above 4 appeals are preferred from the common order dated 19th May 2003 passed by CDRF, Ernakulam ... opposite party M/s Skyline Builders in providing amenities and common facilities to the plots and the villas thereon constructed by the opposite party
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sheela George, vs M/S Skyline Builder,, on 30 April, 2010

VISWANATHAN      : JUDICIAL MEMBER   The above 4 appeals are preferred from the common order dated 19th May 2003 passed by CDRF, Ernakulam ... opposite party M/s Skyline Builders in providing amenities and common facilities to the plots and the villas thereon constructed by the opposite party
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Suryanelly Plantations (P) Ltd. vs Sri.V.P.Gopalakrishnan, on 7 August, 2010

allotment of plots to the complainant.    Thus, the respondent/complainant availed the services of the appellants/opposite parties for getting the plots developed and allotted ... hand over the plots with amenities to the complainants therein.  The complainant herein has also produced copy of the aforesaid common order passed by this
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Nidhi vs Ghaziabad Development Authority on 29 January, 2010

short). Accordingly, we propose to decide these Revision Petitions together by one common order. While the complainant is aggrieved that the State Commission has modified ... inaction and deficient in service. It is common knowledge that when schemes for allotment of plots are floated by various development authorities, an applicant
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next