Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.96 seconds)

A.Muthuramalingam vs /

COMMON ORDER Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the Learned Counsel for the Respondents. 2. The Two petitioners are owners of plots situated ... purchased plots bearing numbers 95 to 100 in the year 2002 and duly registered. Out of these 6 plots, she sold plot number

P.Saravanan vs /

apart land required for carving out roads, leaving open spaces, plotting out smaller plots, etc. The percentage of deduction or the extent of area required ... under : “8. … The first two grounds are devoid of merit. It is common knowledge that when a large block of land is required

P.Saravanan vs /

apart land required for carving out roads, leaving open spaces, plotting out smaller plots, etc. The percentage of deduction or the extent of area required ... under : “8. … The first two grounds are devoid of merit. It is common knowledge that when a large block of land is required

P.Saravanan vs /

apart land required for carving out roads, leaving open spaces, plotting out smaller plots, etc. The percentage of deduction or the extent of area required ... under : “8. … The first two grounds are devoid of merit. It is common knowledge that when a large block of land is required

M.Neminathan vs /

sanctioned, the owner loses his individual right over the portion earmarked for common use. The contention of the plaintiffs Counsel that the suit portion ... promoter of the layout cannot claim right over this portion since the plot owners will not have access to the Velacherry main road

Vijay Shanthi Builders Limited vs /

said development, irrespective of the number of bedrooms in such units/plots/houses. Later, as per instruction of Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the TANGEDCO ... petitioner project comprising of 801 dwelling units, 2 commercial shops and common connections for common facilities in two Phases works out to more than
1   2 Next