boundary as the
plot in question initially was of 10 kathas 4 dhurs, which was
partitioned between the brothers of the common ancestors ... from one Ram Briksh Das, who had
inherited his share from the common ancestor by way of partition of
10 katha 4 dhurs of land
respondents-appellants also that
the plaintiffs and the respondents are from one common ancestor
Bhajju Rai who had two sons, Nokhi ... themselves admit that there was no partition over plot no. 1057 and
their claim that plots of Govindpur Tarasiya and Nawad Khurd
were self acquired
First Appeals are being decided by common Judgment.
2. The lands of the appellants measuring 0.20 acres in plot
No.454 and 460 were acquired
First Appeals are being decided by common Judgment.
2. The lands of the appellants measuring 0.20 acres in plot
No.454 and 460 were acquired
were heard and allowed by a common judgment and order dated
27.07.2004 by a learned Single Judge of this Court.
2 Pursuant to notices issued ... deed on
09.02.1990 in respect of about 5 kathas of land in Plot No 721 on the
northern side thereof. The sale was in favour
were heard and allowed by a common judgment and order dated
27.07.2004 by a learned Single Judge of this Court.
2 Pursuant to notices issued ... deed on
09.02.1990 in respect of about 5 kathas of land in Plot No 721 on the
northern side thereof. The sale was in favour
Surendra Mishra @ Chhotu Mishra vs The State Of Bihar on 25 November, 2016
Author: Aditya
Chandan Mishra vs The State Of Bihar on 25 November, 2016
Author: Aditya Kumar Trivedi
Dinbandhu Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 25 November, 2016
Author: Aditya Kumar Trivedi
being disposed of at the stage of admission itself by a
common judgment.
Since the matter in contest is the same hence for the sake ... other writ petition.
The dispute relates to settlement of land bearing Plot No. 1753
situated in Henry Bazar in the township of Motihari falling under
