relating to the compensation awarded for acquisition of four plots of land. There was a common respondent in each appeal, viz. the Secretary of State
said plot, that the plots of the 9 opposite parties are aroimd plot No. 378, that the partition mends were common, that the opposite parties ... broken the mends with the intention to encroach upon a part of plot No. 378. From this application we can also infer that Salig
three plots and each plot is adjoining to each other. According to him it is not possible to develop any individual plot. Each plot ... that at least from the year 1937 these three plots were treated as a common property for the purpose of tenancy and the open area
Society to whom a plot is allotted by the said Society applies for conversion of his own plot, the conversion charges
at the rate prescribed ... However, before I proceed further to discuss the questions involved which are common in all these writs, let me first summarise the submissions made
were purchased and that the income derived from the sale of the plots could not be treated as income from an adventure in the nature ... appeal. It is common ground that out of the land attached to Krishan Bagh Kothi, 42 plots of 200 sq. yards each have been earmarked
each other. By 1973, the ground floor had been constructed on the plot at Shakti Nagar. It comprised six rooms. The entire family moved from ... right to use the bathroom and the latrine in common with other tenants. The rent was Rs. 375 per month. The lease
Krishan Nagar, Delhi. In 1955 the petitioner purchased 4 plots from M/s. Nirmal Finance India Private Ltd. This land along with certain other lands ... Housing Commissioner, Delhi Administration for the purpose of allotment of plots on concessional basis on certainn condi- tions mentioned in the lease deed
with the adjoining lands and structures at its back being part of plot No. 1772, holding No. 420 in Ward No. III of the Ranchi ... plaint, in which the defendants are running a laundry business commonly known as Messrs Tip Top. The defendants were in occupation of the suit premises
India) is also disposed of as it arises out of the common appellate order of the District Judge under Section 9 of the Public Premises ... Applicant Ayodhya Prasad and applicant Tikaram are brothers and in occupation of plots, total area 10 square meters, near Railway Quarter
suggesting the allotment of plots for the
construction of shops on the footing that each plot would
measure 192 sq. ft. and its market value ... intended,
indicated a premium of Rs. 960. He recommended further that
the plots may
292
be granted without auction and in Bhumidhari right on
payment