policy of the State Government. Still further the plot was commercial and had common approach from Railway roadside. The President countersigned the claim Forms ... plot. On the site plan submitted by the Patwari which is on a plain piece of paper, the Executive Officer verified that the plot
perusal of the said plan also indicates the existence of 10 marlas plots on the North East side of the EWS houses. The petitioner-Association ... residential plots. It was further observed that merely because the area had been left vacant and may have been utilised as common facilities
drawn from the letter Ex.P-4 because it is common knowledge that husbands sometimes do act for their wives.
31. Learned counsel for the appellant ... lieu of the property
abandoned in Pakistan i.e. 20 acres plot at Garden Colony at village Lali Distt. Rohtak
and agricultural land at village
counselling will be held on 20.8.2002 in the
Board Office at Plot No. 1-A, Sector 36-A, Chandigarh...."
It is, thus, clear that ... schools in which they had studied, were subjected to a common entrance test. Their inter-se merit was not being determined on the basis
allotment of the plot at the rate of Rs. 3,600/- per square yard and also informed that the plot cannot be allotted ... common case of the parties that the land of the petitioner was acquired and the policy of the PUDA authorities was to allot the plot
land in suit for the purpose provided in the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 and the Rules framed thereunder. The Gram Panchayat wants ... pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed;-
1. Whether the plot shown by letters ABCD in the site plan attached with the plaint
points involved in that suit and this case are common. For this reason, he withdrew the appeal and prayed for being allowed to withdraw ... with the averments that plaintiff-respondent No.l is owner of residential plot No.EP-201 situated at Sohna, tehsil and district Gurgaon. A site
Umed Singh vs Arya Smaj Sewa Sadan on 23 August, 2002
Equivalent citations: AIR2003P&H87
Kartar Singh vs Patiala Improvement Trust, Patiala And ... on 8 February, 2002
Author: R.L
eastern side of the plot of the defendants. During consolidation, passage was left abutting the plot in dispute comprising Khasra No. 74. Exhibit ... plaintiff was barred under Section 13 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. Suffice it to say, it is not a dispute between
