Yards of L-
385-D plot, which was at the back of the above said plot, was leased to the
petitioner. Learned counsel ... construction of three floors shall be
carried out on joint and common plots. It has been stated that the
construction has been raised in such
consumers and for the benefit of all those
affected plot holders/consumers, who share the common
grievance and seek refund of their money against ... filed "for the benefit of all those
affected plot holders/consumers, who share the common grievance
........", without identifying the said plot holders/consumers
into two plots orwhether the sub-division of
the plot was done prior to 1950; whether Madan Lal resided in a common
unit ... Scheme. In order to claim the benefit of Category A plot, it was on Madan
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:RAHUL SINGH
plot continued to be Plot No. 43/1, Rajpur Road, Civil Lines, Delhi,
since, the bye-laws do not permit sub-division of the plot ... each of the parties were demarcated
along with common appurtenant passage etc. The sub-divided Plot No. 43/1
B, Rajpur Road, Civil Lines, Delhi
less front portion which shall be used for
parking of common vehicles. Since there are two gates, the
gate along with the adjacent Property bearing ... which shall be commonly used by the respondent Nos. 1, 2
and 3 respectively.
4. That the property situated at Dehradun Plot
Order VI rule 4 of the Code qua Kalupur land
and Dairy Plot were provided; similarly, no details qua the existence ... late General had thrown them into a
common hotchpotch, which admittedly was not the case before learned
Single Judge. Lastly, according to respondents, late General
There can be no copyright in an idea, subject
matter, themes, plots or historical or legendary facts
and violation of the copyright in such cases ... developed in a
different manner, it is manifest that the source being
common, similarities are bound to occur. In such a
case the courts should
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Remunerative Project Cell allotted a plot bearing number AG-48,
Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar, Delhi to the partnership firm. The
aforesaid ... petitioner and respondent and, has been lying vacant with a common
lock set up by the parties.
5. Admittedly, over a period of time
constructions. He stated that a restraining order dated November 03,
1997 in Common Cause v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C)
Signature ... construction activities
in unauthorised colonies including Sainik Farm. He stated that the plot
numbered as B-5, Lane 14, Vinod Complex, Sainik Farm which
Preeti Pratap Singh vs Kiran Raj Bisaria on 31 May, 2022
Author: V. Kameswar Rao
