that the encroachment is
only on plot No. 77. Plot No. 76 is to the east of plot No. 78 and
the alleged construction ... boundaries of the plots if they are portions of the same plot, would
undoubtedly be a common question of fact. In other words
would have
access to their respective plots of land from Timarpur Road through the
common access road, as shown in the map. A building plan ... providing access both to the
commercial „Island Plot‟ of the petitioner as well as to the
residential plot of R-2, the petitioner had entered
plot according to such
sanctioned plan with immediate effect and demolish the
constructed part in the rear setback area erected on the said
plot ... rear façade of superstructures constructed on two
adjacent plots joined by way of a common rear boundary wall (as is the case
herein
that
the property of the petitioner does not share any common boundary
with plot Nos. 2, 5 and 7, Canal Road of respondent
intention that all the siblings could live together under a
common roof, a plot measuring 250 square yards bearing
FLOOR AND ALSO THE REA
UTILIZED FOR COMMON FACILITIES
VIZ. STAIRS, PASSAGE ETC.)
c) USE OF COMMON AREAS, FACILITIES
AND SERVICES
Signature Not Verified
Digitally ... COMMON FACILITIES VIZ. STAIRS,
PASSAGE ETC.)
d) USE OF COMMON AREAS, FACILITIES
AND SERVICES
e) 32.5% UNFIVIDED, INDIVISIBLE AND
IMPARTIBLE OWNERSHIP RIGHTS IN
THE PLOT
Hulm Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Fantasy Sports Myfab11 Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. on
plot owners were required to pay a
separate fixed charge towards the capital cost of CETP in terms of the
Delhi Common Effluent Treatment Plants ... notify either the CETP Charges or the fixed charges
payable by the plot owners, despite the fact that the petitioner was
maintaining the CETP plant
characters
include the underdogs with a particular setting in North India. The
commonality extends to active protagonist, the legend, the antagonist,
animal, birds, boiling ... there is a
substantial copy. Plaintiff pleads that the basic plot and storyline of the
script has been copied and that too substantially, thereby infringing
Plaintiff
different plots of land situated in Kailash Nagar Colony, Shahdra, New Delhi.
Pursuant to the said resolutions, sale deeds were executed qua various plots ... common cause of action, which allegedly arose
when the complainant company gained knowledge about the sale of a few
plots stated to be owned
