have been residing separately since 1995 due to family
settlement. A plot measuring 30003500 sq yards was divided equally
in four portions. The portion ... vacant whereas
other three are built up portions. There is a common plot No. i.e 125.
Chaudhary Jagmohan Singh, Uncle of Jasbir, is also
plot
No. 8 alleged by me.........There is a shop in plot No. 9. Again
said, there is one room in plot ... same are
sealed........I can not tell whether there is common wall between
the plot No. 305 and 306. Vol. That there is common wall
Naresh Chandra (A1) by a common friend.
Mohan Jain expressed his desire to purchase a DDA plot. Around
November1993, accused Naresh Chandra ... introduced to
accused Naresh Chandra (A1) through a common friend namely
Nagesh Pathak. He used to come to Delhi for attending exhibitions /
seminars relating
accused Sunil @ Raghu and
Fahim @ Sonu @ Murgi in furtherance of their common intention kidnapped
St. Vs. Sunil @ Raghu ... also been alleged that both the accused in
furtherance of their common intention committed murder of Salman by
strangulation and by causing brick blow
C.B.I. vs . 1. Akhtar Ali Farooquee on 23 December, 2014
IN THE COURT
Jatta for the purpose of development and to carve out
the industrial plot out of the said land. This area was subsequently increased from ... only in respect of plotted area and no lease is executed in respect of land which is
earmarked for common facility shopping center
various other persons and inducing
them to purchase plot against consideration, in furtherance of his
common intention with other accused persons. The accused pleaded ... persons tried to sell certain plots of land to various persons
and also collected certain amount from them. No plot of land was handed
over
been built up out of the common funds of
the family. It is stated that the plot purchased by the plaintiff is
not the same ... khasra number of the plot.
Counsel for defendant has argued that since PW3 could not tell
the khasra number or plot number of the same
parties on those
plots.
14. Plot no. 39: Admittedly, the plot no. 39 is located at the eastern
end of the plot ... defendants. As such, the passage is not the common passage.
15. Plot no. 45: At the western side of the plot no. 39, there
plaintiff is not entitled to claim any other
plot/shop.
H. It is common prudence under law that in order to maintain
the relief
