sake of convenience by which cosharers actually cultivated separately certain plots of common sir.
20. In Raghunath v. Abid ... have been so continuously recorded, etc. etc.
38. It is common ground that plots recorded as sir in this particular village have been so recorded
23rd of the same month. It is common ground that a certain plot of land situate in Jasidih Bazar and numbered 67 was not part
Gour Chand Mullick vs Pradyumna Kumar Mullick And Anr. on 22 March, 1943
Equivalent citations
enough space in his plot to connect the plaintiff's plot "STQA" with the pathway in plot No. 4 if the plaintiff ... succeeded in getting a common pathway open in plots Nos. 4 5 and 6. The first Court dismissed the suit on the ground that
principal defendants are in actual possession of plot No. 2557 and have encroachment on his plot. The point that had to be settled ... forma defendants 10 to 14 were the common landlords of both the plots. Defendants 1 to 6 apparently deny that defendants 7 to 9 have
separate serial member shall be given to dispute and not to each plot. The dispute entry shall not be made in the khasara ... plot. If there is any dispute regarding the person in cultivation possession the plot in the dispute shall be entered in a common khatian containing
separate serial member shall be given to dispute and not to each plot. The dispute entry shall not be made in the khasara ... plot. If there is any dispute regarding the person in cultivation possession the plot in the dispute shall be entered in a common khatian containing
tenant of certain property at the Victoria Road, Byculla, being certain plots of land in the Mustafa Timber Market. The premises are comprised ... plots subject to the two leases prior to September 1,1932, by some former tenancy, and in the case of the plots subject
Gobinda Chandra Ghosh Alias G. Ghosh And ... vs Abdul Majid Ostagar And Ors. on 22
exists owing to gradual encroachment on his khamar land or on neighbouring plots,
and that the bill if enacted into law
will not debar ... Constitution Act (the Government of India Act 1935) was a matter of common knowledge to which the Court was entitled to refer. Whatever
