persons and him come from a common stock of family and are
related to each other. It has been alleged that despite having
knowledge that ... ground that the dispute was for delineating the shares from a
common plot of land and it was beyond the jurisdiction
different
dates from different persons, lands in different quantities
appertaining to common plots as per cadastral survey. She had
applied for mutation. Apparently
taken with regard to the recalling of the
order of allotment of Plot No. C-34.
6. The State Government, referring to the
opinion ... Indian
Institute of Technology (commonly known as "IIT"),
Patna, stood temporarily established on the land
adjacent to the plot of land, which
disputed
plot, the same would change the nature of the suit. It is also
contended by him that on the disputed plot, there are several ... disputed plot.
Learned counsel, appearing for the State submits that
according to the plaintiff's case, the disputed plot is Gair Majarua
land
defendants 2nd set each
having an area of 16 dhurs appertaining to plot nos.1692 and
1693 situated at Mauza Barhariya in the district ... from causing damage to
the shops situated over the plots and for restraining them from
realizing rent or from altering the nature and character
recorded that respondent nos. 9 and 10
are title holder of the plot in dispute. Another prayer has been
sought to quash the order darted ... present case, petitioners and respondent nos. 9
ad 10 are agnates. The common ancestor was Ishar Singh. As per
claim of petitioners, it appears that
Mostt. Sukho Devi in respect of
1.32 acres of land of Plot no. 340 of Khata no. 11 Kha ( Ext-2), is
illegal ... case of both the parties, one Suddhu
Mahto was their common ancestor. Suddhu Mahto had three
sons, namely, Sardari Mahto (ancestor of plaintiff
which shows that the complainant and the petitioners are the heirs
of common ancestor. Learned counsel for the petitioners has
further submitted that an application ... opposite party no.2 submits that he is in
possession of the plot of land, in question. He was harvesting the
grains which
share in the suit property appertaining to plot/khesra No. 186
(new plot no. 321) measuring a total area of 4 kathas 7 dhurs ... only 1 katha 9 dhurs share. As per the
plaint, the common ancestor of the parties was one Ganga Thakur
who died leaving behind seven
charging the opposite party nos. 2 to 5 herein with
obstructing a common passage which he was using since last
15-16 years and which ... opposite party
nos.2 to 5 in exchange of some plot stated to have been given
by the petitioner to the opposite parties
