another portion of the entire
property which was lying as common plot which was the subject
S.A. No.107/1998 6
matter of partition ... that when the properties
were partitioned, E schedule was set apart as common pathway
for the requirements of the sharers. In fact when one goes
grounds, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The disputed plot is Plot No. 150 admeasuring 3,875 sq.mts. situate ... respondent to provide all amenities and common facilities as available to other holders of plots in G.I.D.C. Estate at Ankleshwar, where
their common ancestor Pratap Singh. The dispute is in respect of lands pertaining to revisional survey khata No. 209 and revisional survey plot ... aforementioned plots, where as, according to them the writ petitioners claim half of the same. Their further case is that the common ancestor Pratap Singh
shall be entitled to the said half plot with the said lenament absolutely as tenants-in-common in equal shares."
3. The second property
contractors. The Directors of both the Companies are common. The plaintiffs had purchased a plot of land from F.E. Dinshaw Trust, a registered Public
Bengal Land Reforms Act the disputed plot must be treated as separate holdings although the Jamma may be common. But the definition of 'holding ... cannot be referred to for coming to a conclusion that the disputed plot was partitioned among the pre-emptor, pre-emptee and others
such, to graze his cattle on the common pasture. A, having become the tenant of a plot of uncultivated land in that, village, breaks
specified property by this process, common unspecified rights in larger extents are located into exclusive right over specific plots. In Panchali v. Panningdau Manni ... over specific plots. Whether it be co-ownership, joint family or tenancy, each member is having right over every inch in the common property before
Bhandari purchased the adjoining plot measuring a similar extent by a sale deed dated 10.9.1960. The petitioner's plot bears No. 38, IV Seaward ... plot and the smaller portion in the petitioner's plot. The building had the same foundation and a common roof and in the petitioner
Execution application the decretal plot is shown as C.S. plot No. 562. It is not described by R.S. plot. It is quite amusing ... ordlnate Revislonal Court that it is a common knowledge that R.S. plot No. 562/1779 has been carved out of the mother plot being
