Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 371 (1.17 seconds)

K. Durairaj vs The Secretary

running above the said plots. Moreover, the Electricity Rules also prohibit plots coming under high tension tower. Further portion of Plot ... portion of the land, which was originally reserved for the common purpose into residential plots. On the basis of that application and after due field
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document

S.Dayalan @ Selvam vs D.Namratha

south of Ezhumalai plot, on the east of Ranganathan Vagayara plot, on the north S.Govindarajalu plot. 32. In Ex.A4 which is purchased ... formed for the plots holders and the said plots were also sold to various persons with 20 feet pathway for common purpose thereby the surrender
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Ishwarya vs S.Kannanraj

North by: Item Nos.2 and 3 of the Will properties and common passage South by: House belongs to Thirupathy Manimegalai and wall running from ... Item No.1 of the Will schedule 3 property and common plot with 1/4th right over the common area measuring East to West
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V Parthiban - Full Document

Dr.T.Chinnaraju vs S.Thomas

East : Plot No.7 West : 20 Feet Common Road North : 20 Feet Common Road South : Madhammal Property (Defendant No.4) Value ... this plot No.6 Northern side 1200 sq. feet.is bounded as follows: East : Plot No.7 West : 20 Feet Common Road North : A.Vijayasanthi
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S S Kumar - Full Document

G.Jeyakrishna vs A.Ram Mohan

defendant was the owner of Plot No.5 and he along with the owner of the Plot No.6 had entered into a Joint Venture ... Nathan's Foundation Private Limited to construct one common building over the two plots. However, the Builder had not shown any interest in putting
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next