disputed either that vide memo dated 01.05.2007, a common plot No.9,
Sector 40, Panipat, was allotted to all the co-sharers, in lieu ... given one plot jointly is not sustainable and that each of
the co-sharer is entitled for consideration for allotment of
plot keeping in view
disputed plot what to talk of his being
owner of the same. In either manner, since the disputed plot has been
claimed to be part ... could not be
stated to be maintainable. The disputed plot is unquestionably a vacant
plot of land. The appellant claimed that his possession
Furthermore, the complainant
and his wife who own a plot i.e. Plot No.28 in close vicinity to the
house of the petitioner ... some influential persons, started
illegally raising the height of a common wall between their plots,
against the approved zoning plan. The petitioner thus opposed
Collector (Panchayat Lands), Moga, under Section 7
of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter
referred to as 'the Act') through ... PHHC:155093-DB
others from plot of 32 marla common land in the occurrence of the village
Ghall Kalan Pati Mehar under Abadi Deh having
planning
1. 7646 of 2016 10 plots of 1 Kanal, 4 plots of 14 Marla, 3 plots of 10
Surender Kumar etc. Marla ... plots of 6 Marla, 20 plots of 8 Marla, 12 Plots of
Dhani Ram etc. 10 Marla, 1 Plot of 14 Marla, 28 Plots
dispute between the
family of the petitioner regarding a plot and on receiving the complaint,
the respondent No.2 recorded the statement of the petitioner ... petitioner are having a common ancestor, is claiming 1/3rd share
in the plot and he will produce all the documents in the Court
Panchayat, despite the same becoming
earmarked in the consolidation proceedings, as a common path (rasta-e-
aam), for use by the inhabitants of the village ... respective taks/plots, which would be both
highly unjust and arbitrary.
15. The provisions of Rule 5 of the Punjab Village Common
Lands (Regulation) Rules
embroiled in a controversy.
The bone of contention is a common wall between two plots. On the ground
floor, the width of wall ... space towards the plot of
the respondents. The petitioner filed a suit restraining the respondents from
demolishing a portion of the common wall. The trial
plot, which does not belong to him. The First Appellate
Court has found that the plots are part of a decree having a common
khata ... joint khata.
Learned counsel representing the appellant does not dispute
that the plots are part of the same Khewat. In such circumstances, the
remedy
preparing a
lay out, carving out roads, leaving open space, plotting out
smaller plots, waiting for purchasers (meanwhile the invested
money will be blocked ... required to be set apart for carving out
lands and plotting out small plots. The discounting will to
some extent also depend on whether
