aforesaid plot and he was residing in
aforesaid plot from the very same day when he got possession of the plot. On
25.3.90, all accused ... furtherance of their common intention trespassed in the
aforesaid plot of the complainant and thrown the articles belonging to complainant
outside and tried to demolish
before 15.11.87they in furtherance of
their common intention committed house tress pass in plot no.93A
Hastsal Road Uttam Nagar.
2. Vide separate charge ... allegations that on 14.7.86 they all in furtherance of their common
3
intention prepared forged false deed which was executed by Smt.
Bimla Devi
State vs Hans Raj on 21 July, 2007
-:1:-
IN THE COURT OF SH. NARINDER
Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi and defendant no. 1
is in possession of plot of land bearing no. C-325 in khasra no.
574/326, Kotla ... there is a vacant plot of land which is being
used by both the parties as a common passage and the same
is the only
their common intention in between 15.3.99 to 05.09.88 cheated
S.K. Arora the complainant fraudulently by inducing him to deliver
genuine papers of plot ... their common intention
in between 15.3.99 to 05.09.88 cheated S.K. Arora the complainant
fraudulently by inducing him to deliver genuine papers of plot
accused persons
2
in furtherance of their common intention committed house tress pass
by entering the plot no. C-23 Anand Vihar Uttam Nagar belonging ... persons in furtherance of
their common intention removed the boundary wall and all building
material including the bricks from plot no.23 belonging to complainant
plot
measuring 100 square yards situated at Karawal Nagar and then introduced one
Rajbir Singh as the owner of the plot, since accused Bhagwan ... Devi and Bhagwan Das
in furtherance of their common intention induced the complainant to purchase
a plot, which was not belonging to them and dishonestly
Shri M. P. Singh
R/O House No.XI/4239-A/3
(Plot No.3), First Floor
Shri Raj Krishan Jain Street
1-Ansari Road ... same facts and common evidence has also been recorded in all the three
cases and there arises common question of facts and law, and with
sought his 1/3
rd share in the suit plot. It is submitted that the society was created
by the dealers and the firm ... that the amount
deposited by the firm remained common or joint fund and when the
10
plot will be alloted the said plot will
house is in opposite side. He further pleaded that there is a plot
bearing No.12, Dharam Colony, Nangloi, Delhi measuring ... different people are situated there in. There
was a common private passage in the plot. He has not encroached on public
land. The defendants prayed
