plaintiff are in joint possession of
the said plot which has been jointly inherited from the common ancestor Late Sh.
Ram Dayal ... both the parties and major portion of the plot is lying vacant for the common use
of the parties. It is submitted that the total
value of plot No.62 at ` 143,000 per cottah, plot
6
No.42 at `135,000 per cottah and plot ... valuer is as under :
Description Plot No.62 Plot No.42 Plot No.272
Base rate (Re : Plot No.192 under deed
alia that all the six persons including respondent No. 1 have
their common interest in the disputed street alongwith co-
inhabitants of the same area ... ground as detailed in the site plan for the common use of all the
plot
holders
of the
colony,
but
further
allegation was that
order that the common Central Excise registration certificate No.AAACE0074BXM004 granted to M/s.Escorts Limited (AMG), Plot No.2 & 3, Sector ... goods manufactured from one premises to other premises, common administration, common sales tax registration, common income tax assessment as contemplated in para 3.2 of CBEC
discretionary powers by the Chief
6
Minister in regard to allotment of plots in the Salt Lake City.
Challenge was also raised against the deviation ... allotment of plots should be exercised in accordance with the
7
criteria stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Common Cause,
A Registered
said colony after leaving area for
roads and other common infrastructure. The plots were allotted to its
members in the year
petitioner is entitled to take
supply of electricity to plot no.504 using the common passage using which the
other co-owners of the property
another layout plan (Annexure C-30) in
which the front common park of Plot No.206 was vanished and OPs were also
proposing to construct ... know that the rear common green park was also
deleted by the OPs and they were coming up with residential plots at the rear
side
common
passage of all sorts in, over and along the side passage.
Interestingly, it was pointed out that the plot that was
gifted ... front portion of the original plot which belonged to
Phani Mohan Banerjee. Therefore, she did not need the
common passage for the purpose of ingress
Managing Partner of the plaintiff firm threw the suit properties into the common hotch pot of the plaintiff firm. On the request of the defendants ... that the suit property was put to common hotch pot of the plaintiff and was divided into plots and the same was not disputed
