Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

between the two shares and the plot continued as a single common plot. 10. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out that the petitioner

plots were earmarked for construction of independent villas alone and the 38th plot for construction of multi storied flats. For convenience of the plots/flat ... from the main road having 7 meter width and common infrastructures were provided. 37 plots were sold to various purchasers who were given only

purchase certificate of the year, 1976. Advocate Commissioner also stated that plot-A marked in Ext.C4 (suit property ... lies contiguous with a common boundary. Advocate Commissioner has marked a plot towards north-western portion of plot-A (suit property) since one Karthyayani Amma

compact plot. In fact it is in two blocks as per the Will. The attempt of the plaintiff is to enclose the common pathway provided ... common pathway as per the Will. 5. The trial court found that the plaint A schedule is described as if it is a compact plot

plots-P and P1 to P5. The disputed property (plaint B schedule) is plot-P5 situated towards south- western portion of the entire property ... that plots-P1 and P2 are included in the 8 Acres covered by Ext.A1, his present stand is that the said plots

plots-P and P1 to P5. The disputed property (plaint B schedule) is plot-P5 situated towards south- western portion of the entire property ... that plots-P1 and P2 are included in the 8 Acres covered by Ext.A1, his present stand is that the said plots

these writ petitions have raised a common issue, viz. denial of permission to change the classification of the plot as dry land

disposed of by this common judgment. 2. Petitioner in W.P.(C).3098/12 owns a plot of land situated

demolish the illegal roof put up by the first respondent in the common pathway and in the open space blocking the ventilation and light ... According to petitioner, there is a common pathway which starts from the southern main road and ends in plot No.1 which is allotted

impugned in these appeals are decided by the learned Subordinate Judge by common judgment. 2. The property involved in LAA No.869/09 was included ... Reference Court to Category 4. 3. The ground which is commonly raised in both the appeals is that the Reference Court was not justified