that the private
respondents are carrying out illegal construction in a common plot
of the Society and, therefore, an application was made to the
District ... registered Sale Deed which is claimed by the
petitioners as common plot of the Society.
3. After considering the documents, the District Collector,
Anand found
Colly to this petition) and
remove the illegal encroachment from the
common plot of the society within a
stipulated time that may be fixed
Banshi had purchased land
in dispute in the present lis, vide common sale deed
dated 15.09.2005, comprised in Khata Khatauni
No.327/368, kitas 6, measuring ... their plot (s). They divided this land
between themselves amicably and occupied their plots
leaving one meter common passage from eastern side of
the plot
possession where
different plaintiffs had sought injunction against common defendants
with regard to plot No.77 measuring 287-7/9 sq. yards and plot ... were also lying in the said
plot and the adjoining plot No.78 and northern-western sides of plot
No.77 were surrounded
4240/18 2 Common Judgment
Accountant, R/o Plot No.69,
Nawab Galli, Gokulpeth, Nagpur.
2. Madhusudan S/o Shrikrishna Binzani,
Aged about 55 years ... 2019 22:47:54 :::
WPs 4239&4240/18 3 Common Judgment
3. Adv.Rajendra S/o Jagannath Rathi,
Aged about 59 years, Occu: Legal
Area of Transaction Value Registration
No Deed- Sale constructi property sold plot (sq. (ILR) value (as per
. Registrat on mer.) circle rate ... space for one
utility with
common W.C.
in the stilt
area + 22.5%
undivided
ownership
rights in the
plot of land
31. It is noticed
4240/18 2 Common Judgment
Accountant, R/o Plot No.69,
Nawab Galli, Gokulpeth, Nagpur.
2. Madhusudan S/o Shrikrishna Binzani,
Aged about 55 years ... 2019 22:47:47 :::
WPs 4239&4240/18 3 Common Judgment
3. Adv.Rajendra S/o Jagannath Rathi,
Aged about 59 years, Occu: Legal
part only of the joint property, retaining the
rest in common.
14. As such, it is argued that the trial court was justified in dismissing ... which they purchased the properties‐in‐question were
common, although the plot numbers in their entirety are not identical.
16. The schedules of the deeds
been further averred that there was no
common path ever constructed on common land, nor it was
ever a passage shown in the revenue papers ... purchased by the plaintiff there existed a common path from
the main road to the plots, comprised in Khata/Khatauni No.
74/106, Khasra
mentioned
plot of land. The opposite party came to know from the petitioner on 27th
December, 2000 that he had purchased RS plot ... Since the opposite party, being the adjacent owner, having longest
common boundary with the case land was not served with any notice
under Section
