respondent No.4 - Gram Panchayat,
the said plot was used by the residents of the village for common purposes
and according to Section ... further argued that the plot in dispute is
not being used for any common purpose of the village, such as streets, lanes,
wells etc., situated
people present at the
site that plot in question was Share-am plot meant for common
purposes over which a platform of 6x10 ft. existed ... villagers drew
water. It was a Share-am plot meant for common purposes
L.P.A. No.530 of 2011 (O&M) -8-
over
people present at the site that plot in
question was Share-am plot meant for common purposes over
which a platform ... villagers drew water. It was a
Share-am plot meant for common purposes over which a platform of 6
feet x 10 feet existed
owner in possession of plots No. 261, 262 and 263 and co-sharer and
co-owner in plots No. 259 and 260, situated within ... converted into Rasta-aam and is being used as
common rasta. Plots No. 259 and 260 are owned and possessed by
Mahender etc.
From
said colony after leaving area for
roads and other common infrastructure. The plots were allotted to its
members in the year
width of the said rasta is 2 karams. The
common passage is the only common passage available to
the plaintiff and the defendants are attempting ... plea that the suit property was not a common
passage and it is a rasta to plot No. 122 and 123 only. There
1283 and 1329 of 1985, respectively, are being
disposed of by this common judgment as the same questions of fact
and law are involved therein ... locality as common place.
It was further alleged that the Municipal Committee,
Safidon (appellant herein), wanted to sell these plots at a
much lower price
action taken by the Gram Panchayat to allot 100 Sq.Yards residential
plots to the families of weaker Section of Society out of the land ... thus, use of this land for the purpose of
allotment of plots would be illegal, unconstitutional, unjust, unfair,
besides being wrong erroneous, arbitrary, cumbersome, oppressive
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964, had formulated a
scheme for allotment of 5 marlas plots to the homeless, Scheduled Castes,
weaker sections ... consonance with Rule 13A of the
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964. Undisputedly, the
plots allotted to the petitioners under the Scheme were never
State of Haryana framed a Policy dated 1.2.2008, deciding
to allot residential plots measuring 100 square yards to the families of
Scheduled Caste and persons ... allotment of those plots. In view of said Policy, respondent No.4 decided to
allot 100 square yard plots to the persons belonging
