P.Natarajan vs D.Lawrence on 28 February, 2011
different sale deeds, the entire extent of 3.75 acres forms single plot with common boundaries.
(ii) The plaintiff entered into a sale agreement with
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 120 (0.96 seconds)G.P.Rudhrashan vs The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board on 23 August, 2011
However, CMDA refused planning clearance stating that the common land (lane) cannot be converted into residential plots in the old Vijayaraghavapuram MUDP Scheme. In view ... There is no provision for conversion of lane into residential plot.
v)Conversion of common lane into residential plot would lead to non-availability
Mr.Sellaraj vs The Residents Of Uma Nagar on 18 August, 2011
suit property and other properties as a common area for the benefit of other plot owners and also handed over the common area ... properties which were reserved for common purposes were reserved only for the benefit of the persons, who purchased the plots. Therefore, they have got every
Muruga Udayar (Died) vs Thirumalai Enterpreses on 10 June, 2011
Managing Partner of the plaintiff firm threw the suit properties into the common hotch pot of the plaintiff firm. On the request of the defendants ... that the suit property was put to common hotch pot of the plaintiff and was divided into plots and the same was not disputed
The Chief Conservator Of Forests vs P.Subramaniam on 8 August, 2011
24032/2010
- - - -
COMMON ORDER
I and II.Writ petitions relating to Plot Watchers and Social Forestry Workers regarding claim for Minimum Wages :
The petitioners ... these writ petitions may vary from writ petition to writ petition, a common question involved is their legal right to get differential wages as ordered
Krishnammal vs Paramasivan on 16 December, 2011
made to run along the common pathway and
thereby shrinking and shortening the width of the common pathway as revealed by
the Advocate Commissioner ... defendants encroached into the
said common pathway to an extent of 1 feet and 2 inches adjoining their plots on
the eastern side. In other
Indian Bank Employees Union vs M.A.Zubaida Ammal on 30 March, 2011
Indian Bank Employees Union vs M.A.Zubaida Ammal on 30 March, 2011
Author: R
The Commissioner vs Sri. V. Varada Ganesa Perumal on 14 December, 2011
apart for the
common community purpose at the time of plotting out the lands. Therefore, it is
clear that the temple was constructed only ... distribution of prasadams like sacred water and thulasi,
it is common that even in houses, after performing poojas, Hindus used to
distribute prasadams. So, merely
Sri Krishna Tiles And Potteries ... vs All Government Staff Social Welfare ... on 14 June, 2011
allot 75 percent of such plots to the members of the 1st respondent Trust and to allot 25 percent plots to outsiders for consideration ... against 692 plots plotted, only 530 plots were approved and remaining area is earmarked as common area like roads, parks, etc. As per the terms
A. Arumugam vs P.M. Sayinathan on 10 August, 2011
were earmarked as a road, park and other common areas cannot be converted into residential plots. But the owners are entitled to apply for revised ... area which was originally earmarked as road, suit property, was reconverted into plots and the same is used as Thirumana Mandapam. The appellant having