purchase of a plot.
8. The facts of this ground are that the assessee purchased a plot of land along with one built-up room ... 18th Feb., 2004, stated that the fair market value of this plot commonly known as godown, ranged between Rs. 9 lakhs to Rs. 12 lakhs
show that any portion of the property was kept common
and the boundaries of plot B and C schedule properties show
that no property ... kept common in between the said plots,
finding of courts below that plaint D schedule property was not
kept common is perfectly correct. If that
allotment of alternative plot. That request was acceded to by the Delhi Administrative on 28.1.1980, which recommended allotment of an alternative plot of 250 square ... sons of Kanwar Lal. At their request, in stead of composite/common plot, separate plots measuring 125 square yards each were recommended
from their exclusive well through the common channel would be throwing additional burden on the common channel and common land which was not and could ... which the common well W.2 is situate and the channel running from that common well were, however, kept joint for the common enjoyment
house site there is a common road and both the roads are common for the owners of the house plots therein. The 1st defendant ... feet. This plot has been earmarked in Ex.C.5-survey plan as plot No.2. So the plot purchased by the plaintiff under
treatment being given to
SCA/18501/2007 2/2 ORDER
the common plot of the Panchayat and also to one bungalow which
is seen from
Thakkar, learned advocate for the petitioner pointed
out that the entire common plot of the Cooperative Housing Society
is taken away by the Town Planning ... marked for
commercial purpose, rendering the society without having facility of
common plot.
RULE. Mr.Satyam Chhaya, learned Assistant Government
Pleader waives service of Rule
road in question and also
laying of pipeline through the common plot belonging
to Bopal Gram Panchayat. Bopal Gram Panchayat to
produce the relevant record
claimed by all the five Petitioners, namely Respondents 3 to 7, were common to the extent that they challenged the Circular dated 2nd September ... electricity from its CPP to its own unit in a nearby plot. Since common questions were raised by the five CPP holders, the Commission dealt
passage. The plaintiffs also state that the common owner has also sold the remaining extent in plot No.7A of the Eastern side ... defendants were husband and wife and both the plots were treated as a common and contiguous properties and therefore, there was no question of independent
