Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Building vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 September, 2011 Author: B.P. Dharmadhikari Bench

Building vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 September, 2011 Author: B.P. Dharmadhikari Bench

plot adjoining the Plaintiffs' plot belonged to the Government of Maharashtra. It was used to house police barracks. The Plaintiffs' plot was admittedly ... adjoining plots being Plot Nos.242, 243 and 244 as its own plot cannot be bypassed. This aspect further shows that that plot was sought

first floor. However, in one corner of the plot there are common latrines and they were used by the landlady as well as the tenant ... suit premises and a common latrine /water closet was situated in a separate small structure in a corner of the plot on the ground floor

bearing C.S. No. 4, Fort Sub-Division, Mumbai (commonly known as "the Cooperage plot") by carrying out construction to the extent

plot adjoining the Plaintiffs' plot belonged to the Government of Maharashtra. It was used to house police barracks. The Plaintiffs' plot was admittedly ... adjoining plots being Plot Nos.242, 243 and 244 as its own plot cannot be bypassed. This aspect further shows that that plot was sought

couple of years. He, however, obtained license for medical practice. A plot was purchased by the Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 in their joint name ... owner of the said plot and bungalow which was constructed thereon and he, therefore, was claiming partition of the common property and for possession

projects constructed during the specified period, on a specified size of the plot with residential units of the specified size, it cannot be inferred that ... view to make available large number of affordable houses to the common man and not with a view to deny commercial user in residential buildings

ground that the borrower had executed the mortgage of the plot along with the structure of the open foundation in its favour ... Sale. On 29/03/2005 the Recovery officer, DRT Nagpur passed a common order whereby the objection of the Petitioners was accepted on the ::: Downloaded

relation to the redevelopment which is taking place on the adjoining plot, C.S.200. The deficiency has been condoned by the Municipal Commissioner ... Eighth Respondents for condoning the deficiency in the open space. It is common ground between Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the Seventh