Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Jasbir Singh Chhabra & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 9 March, 2010

Om Parkash vs Union Of India & Ors on 8 February, 2010 Equivalent citations: AIR

said plot. She challenged the acquisition notifications vide CWP No. 18087 of 1995. The writ petition was dismissed by the High Court by common judgment ... been released. While releasing land of more than 40 landowners having plots of size from 150 sq. yards to 1500 sq. yards, if development plan

layout, 10% of such land was bound to be reserved for common purposes. The High Court firstly came to the conclusion that the Trust itself ... common purpose in addition to the area provided for laying out streets. It is nobody's case that the area of these 40 plots

inspection report. As per the inspection report, there is only one plot being Plot No. 136, Industrial Area-A, Ludhiana and in that Smt. Kartari ... load of that connection is found running on this side. 7. The common wall of both sides has one shutter and one Kainchi Gate

documentary evidence as was required under the Regulations and assigning new plot numbers without any authority in flagrant violation of law. As regards ... been put on par although joint enquiry was held and there was common evidence. 14. Secondly, the Tribunal failed to notice that respondent was holding

grave miscarriage of justice. 39. It is not disputed that the commercial plot of 788 sq.yards located at Delhi-Mathura Mewla Maharajpur, Faridabad ... evading the payment of actual stamp duty. It is a matter of common knowledge that usually the circle rate or the collector rate is lower

considering the oral and documentary evidence 3  produced before him, passed a common judgment and order dated 29.12.1997 fixing the market value of the land ... acquired was a large tract of land whereas the exemplar is small plot of land. 6. Contention of the respondents on the other hand

land which is to be used for residential purposes is concerned, a plot away from the main road is often of more value ... land acquired from Jamalpur Kalan and the present land share a common boundary behind the ECE factory. The belting system in the facts

complainant party for daring to assert their right on the plot in question. From their conduct it can safely be held that the murder ... Upendra Singh and injuries to PW-4 were immediately connected with their common object and, therefore, their case falls within the ambit of Section