When the plaintiff asserted a right of common pathway for this plot of
property under Ex.A.2 by the vendor of the entire property ... main road on the
East but for the common pathway. Indeed, to this plot of property
pathway should have been provided
appellant. It was submitted that the appellant was in possession of
the plot in question and as he had deposited the part
consideration ... plot is incorrect inasmuch
as the plaintiff had constructed a common wall on plot nos. 1 and
2, therefore, the determination made in this regard
proceedings dated 01.02.2019. Seven plots were identified and the
petitioner was allotted Plot No.47. Towards allotment of the said plots, a
patta was issued ... patta was issued for a common area, the petitioner
would have at least asked for allotment of some alternative plot. In any
case, the order
proceedings dated 01.02.2019. Seven plots were identified and the
petitioner was allotted Plot No.46. Towards allotment of the said plots, a
patta was issued ... patta was issued for a common area, the petitioner
would have at least asked for allotment of some alternative plot. In any
case, the order
proceedings dated 01.02.2019. Seven plots were identified and the petitioner
was allotted Plot No.44. Towards allotment of the said plots, a patta was issued ... patta was issued for a common area, the petitioner would have at least asked
for allotment of some alternative plot. In any case, the order
proceedings dated 01.02.2019. Seven plots were identified and the
petitioner was allotted Plot No.45. Towards allotment of the said plots, a
patta was issued ... patta was issued for a common area, the petitioner
would have at least asked for allotment of some alternative plot. In any
case, the order
proposed and not yet developed. Thus, there is a
reservation of plots or lands earmarked for gardens / public
gardens, but some gardens ... identification in the Development
Control Regulations is similar or common, then, which of these
SRP 2/5
::: Uploaded on - 05/02/2020 ::: Downloaded
respondents to appoint
the petitioner as Plot Watcher/anti poaching Watcher in supernumerary Post
as per the common order passed by the Division bench ... Writ of Mandamus
directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Plot Watcher / Anti
Poaching Watcher in a Supernumerary post.
2.It is the case
owner of plot situated at Maharana Pratap Marg, Alirajpur area
52.6 x 118 sq. ft. = 1235 sq. ft.. The aforesaid plot was divided
between five ... recorded in the record of
Municipal Council. There is a common land behind the plot No.22
and 25 area
between two plots being plot no.366, 367 and 370.
The right of the applicant to use the said common passage was upheld
upto
