adjudication of the issues raised in the writ
petition. More-so, the contempt petition is filed after a lapse of about five
years, which ... condonation of
delay in filing a petition and not with respect to
condonation of delay in re-presenting a petition.
Page
Ashok Chandra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 February, 2015
W.P.No
Appellant in his
Affidavit in reply to the Contempt Petition had stated
that the Contempt Petition of Respondent No.1-6 is
barred ... applicable to
Contempt Petition. In any case, the learned
Single Judge ought to have rejected the
Contempt Petition, since it was not
accompanied
would only mean remedies other than filing the
present contempt petitions. Therefore, these
contempt petitions would not be maintainable on the
ground of approbation ... special leave petition that these
contempt petitions have been filed. We think that
these contempt petitions are hit by the principles of
delay and laches
delay of about 32 years, whereas the
limitation under Section 20 of Contempt of Counts Act, 1971, is one year.
Therefore, the present contempt petition ... that limitation period for
initiating contempt proceedings is one year under Section 20 of the Act and
delayed contempt petition filed after 13 years
right to file contempt petition within
the stipulated limitation period, but after lapse of more than two years, no
contempt petition has been filed ... years and three months without any application for condonation of
delay. Hence, this contempt petition is time barred and petitioner has failed to
explain
appearance of the Applicant
where the Contempt Petition was taken up on 30.08.2019, the NCLT dismissed
the Contempt Petition, for want of prosecution. Seeking recall ... 2024 Page 5 of 14
30.08.2019 and to restore the Contempt Petition being Contempt Petition
No.154/BB/2019, to its original number. The consequential
appearance of the Applicant
where the Contempt Petition was taken up on 30.08.2019, the NCLT dismissed
the Contempt Petition, for want of prosecution. Seeking recall ... 2024 Page 5 of 14
30.08.2019 and to restore the Contempt Petition being Contempt Petition
No.154/BB/2019, to its original number. The consequential
appearance of the Applicant
where the Contempt Petition was taken up on 30.08.2019, the NCLT dismissed
the Contempt Petition, for want of prosecution. Seeking recall ... 2024 Page 5 of 14
30.08.2019 and to restore the Contempt Petition being Contempt Petition
No.154/BB/2019, to its original number. The consequential
Rajender Kumar & Ors. vs . State Of H.P. & Ors. A/W Connected ... on