Marks Act, 1999 and also under section 62 (2)
of the Copyright Act, 1957 and the Code of Civil
Procedure ... Page 4 of 26
section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and the Code of Civil Procedure ,
1908. The learned single judge, placing reliance
infringement of copyright and stipulates that the
‗owner' of the Copyright shall, except as otherwise provided in that Act, be
entitled to all such ... owner of the copyright)
conferring any right comprised in the copyright in a work.
13. Section 61 of the Copyright Act, 1957 also stipulates that
Trademarks Act, 1999 and Section 62(2) of the
Copyright Act, 1957. The specific plea with regard to jurisdiction was made in
paragraph ... Information Technology Act,
2000 and amending other statutes, Parliament had consciously not amended
the Trademarks Act, 1999 or the Copyright Act, 1957 or the Code
Act, 1956 . It is also registered as a copyright society under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The registered office of the company ... Joint Committee deliberations in respect of the Copyright Bill, 1955 prior to the enactment of the Copyright Act, 1957 in its present form. He referred
Trade Marks Act, 1999 as also the Copyright Act, 1957 seeking
permanent injunction restraining infringement of its trade mark and
copyright. The suit was also ... trade mark/label are also registered under the
provisions of The Copyright Act, 1957 . It is alleged that the
appellant/plaintiff is the owner
copyrights.--(1) Where copyright is any work has
been infringed, the owner of the copyright shall, except
as otherwise provided by this Act, be entitled ... owner of the copyright
and the copyright society may provide, only that which is permitted by
The Copyright Act, 1957 would be permissible and enforceable
owner of a copyright", for the purposes of chapter XII would include an exclusive licensee. Section 30 of the Copyright Act, 1957 was also ... owns or may own copyright. This right of Prentice-Hall of India is a right protected by the Indian Copyright Act . Hence the violation
institute a suit under the Trade Marks Act,
1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957 , as the case may be, by
taking advantage of the provisions ... Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act
1999 as the Plaintiff being the owner of the copyright and the
registered
Copyright Board at New Delhi passed an order in
exercise of the powers conferred under Section 31 (1) (b) of the Copyright
Act, 1957 directing ... passed by the Copyright
Board, the Registrar of Copyrights granted licences under Section 31(1)(b)
of the Copyright Act to the appellant
name of the plaintiff as the lead singer amounted to an illegal act on the part of the defendants. It was submitted by the plaintiff ... infringement of the performer's rights in terms of the Copyright Act, 1957 .
5. The plaintiff's lawyers sent a notice dated
