arbitrarily declined.
ii) Quash notification dated 06.01.2021 (Annexure A-2) read
with Corrigendum dated 13.01.2021 (Annexure A-3), as it
makes applicable letter dated ... taking such action qua
applicants. It is settled law that scope of corrigendum is to
carry out minor correction and it cannot make material change
arbitrarily declined.
ii) Quash notification dated 06.01.2021 (Annexure A-2) read
with Corrigendum dated 13.01.2021 (Annexure A-3), as it
makes applicable letter dated ... taking such action qua
applicants. It is settled law that scope of corrigendum is to
carry out minor correction and it cannot make material change
qualification experience and date of birth etc. The respondents also issued a corrigendum by which the total number of posts was increased ... shown at Sr. No.27 (A-10). The respondents had issued a corrigendum dated 21.9.2012 indicating that definition of OBC in UT Chandigarh is that
days before his retirement i.e. on
12.07.2023, the respondents issued a corrigendum dated 12.07.2023
reducing his pay from Rs.98700/- to Rs.95800 ... from the retiral benefits of the
applicant. However, the impugned corrigendum does not speak about
how much is the recovery and how has it been
further submitted that in this context, Government of India issued a corrigendum dated 16.01.1998 wherein they had decided to grant reservation to physically handicapped category ... direct recruitment. It is also submitted that O.M dated 16.01.1998 is corrigendum to earlier O.M dated 18.02.1997 which does not talk of reservation
Direct the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to issue corrigendum to the
notification dated 07.04.2021 (A-1) or issue fresh notification
so as to include ... Application seeking directions to Respondents
Nos. 1 and 3 to issue a corrigendum to the notification
dated 07.04.2021 (Annexure A-1) or a fresh notification
stated that well before the
commencement of examination for this recruitment, a
corrigendum was issued by office specifying that ESIC
reserved the right ... that
well before the commencement of the Examination,
the respondents published a corrigendum dated
20.08.2015 in different newspapers mentioning
therein that ESIC shall have discretion
stated that well before the
commencement of examination for this recruitment, a
corrigendum was issued by office specifying that ESIC
reserved the right ... that
well before the commencement of the Examination,
the respondents published a corrigendum dated
20.08.2015 in different newspapers mentioning
therein that ESIC shall have discretion
stated that well before the
commencement of examination for this recruitment, a
corrigendum was issued by office specifying that ESIC
reserved the right ... that
well before the commencement of the Examination,
the respondents published a corrigendum dated
20.08.2015 in different newspapers mentioning
therein that ESIC shall have discretion
stated that well before the
commencement of examination for this recruitment, a
corrigendum was issued by office specifying that ESIC
reserved the right ... that
well before the commencement of the Examination,
the respondents published a corrigendum dated
20.08.2015 in different newspapers mentioning
therein that ESIC shall have discretion
