Very
interestingly, the complainant has not denied this specific
defence. The cross-examination of complainant discloses
that, he does not know anything about accused ... cross-examination. The evidence of accused
remained unchallenged and his defence also remained
unchallenged. During cross-examination, PW.1-complainant
has not denied the defence
this minor child namely P.W. 2 has gone unchallenged in the cross-examination. However, the Tribunal has awarded ... spent Rs. 6,000/- for medical expenses. This has gone unchallenged in the cross-examination. There is no impediment to award this amount towards medical
cross-
examination, the employment of accused under
compassionate ground is unchallenged. Cross-examination
was in respect of the fact that during the working tenure ... appearing SSLC examination and he was provided with
Ex.P2, but this statement was not found in the entire
cross-examination
that she bled per vagina and her statement
remained virtually unchallenged in cross-examination. To
constitute rape penetration, however slight is sufficient.
Prosecutrix subjected ... that she bled
per vagina and her statement remained virtually
unchallenged in cross-examination. To constitute rape
penetration, however slight is sufficient. Prosecutrix
subjected
this fact stated by her is not disputed in her
cross examination. The unchallenged version of
36 RFA No.2588/2006
this fact stated by her is not disputed in her
cross examination. The unchallenged version of
36 RFA No.2588/2006
cross-examination is meticulously examined,
the Insurance Company has virtually given a go-by
and there is absolutely no cross-examination in regard
to which ... examined and his
testimony in examination-in-chief has gone
unchallenged in cross-examination. The evidence of
12
PW.3 is credible and trustworthy
other words more than 14 sq. mts. The cross-examination of C. W. 1 does not disclose incriminating evidence to disbelieve his testimony ... payment of rents after the notice to quit having remained unchallenged in the cross-examination, is a pointer to the intention of the respondent landlord
pending before the court-below. It is also elicited in the cross-examination of the petitioner that the son and daughter-in-law are residing ... presently available with her is only one room has gone unchallenged in cross-examination. Learned Counsel for petitioner Mr.V.B.Shivakumar relied upon
house of the appellant has not been challenged in her cross-examination. No doubt, she admitted that she had no ill-will against ... that he brought her back. His evidence also remains unchallenged in his cross-examination. A suggestion was made on behalf of the appellant that