Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2904 (1.80 seconds)

State vs . Bijender @ Bandri & Anr. on 31 March, 2018

over to the IO.  Testimony of this witness also remained unchallenged during cross­ examination. vi)   PW­6 Constable Hansraj is the photographer.   He proved ... collectively   as Ex.PW6/B. His testimony also remained unchallenged during cross­examination by on behalf of all the accused. State Vs. Bijender @ Bandri
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Virender Gupta Etc. Page 1 Of 28 on 21 April, 2018

made payment to Sh. Amarnath. Testimony of PW­1 remained unchallenged during cross­ examination by ld. Defence Counsel. ii) PW­2 is SI Rajeev Ranjan ... custody. His   testimony   remained   unchallenged   during   cross­ examination on behalf of accused Sandeep and Devender. During cross­examination on behalf of accused Virender
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ellappa vs The Inspector Of Police on 28 February, 2018

cross examination and cross examination was conducted on 17.08.2017, nearly, after one year. Even during the cross examination, her evidence of the victim girl ... alleged occurrence on 28.12.2011 and 30.12.2011, the same remains unchallenged in the cross examination, assumes significance. The alleged eye wash marriage has to make
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahesha vs N.Praksah on 18 November, 2016

oral or in writing. PW-1 has stated as under during cross examination: "The defendant has promised to repay the amount within one year ... borrowed amount with interest. His evidence is not denied in cross examination. Unchallenged evidence of PW-1 establishes the case of the plaintiff that
Bangalore District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Arjun Paswan Etc. Page 1 Of 27 on 20 March, 2018

Testimony   of   this   witness   remained   unchallenged   during cross­examination. iii) PW­3 is Ct. Shantnu, who has proved the computer generated copy of PCR form ... testimony is also remained unchallenged during cross­ examination. iv) PW­4   Inspector   Manohar   Lal  is   the   draftsman,   who deposed   that   on   19.11.2011   he   was   called
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Shiv Kumar on 30 January, 2013

here that statement of PW6 Ct. Dharmender has gone unchallenged for want of any cross examination. PW7 PW7 ASI Bharam Singh Incharge ... Prakash Yadav. Although the statement of PW12 has gone unchallenged for want of cross examination, there is no evidence on record to suggest that aforesaid
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 24 April, 2018

Testimony of this witness remained unchallenged during cross­examination. ii) PW­2  HC   Umed   Singh   is   a   formal   witness,   who   on receipt of information, went ... charge­sheet in this case. Testimony of this witness remained unchallenged during cross­examination. v)   PW­5  Ms.   Promila   is   the   injured   and   another
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 27 April, 2018

Testimony of this witness remained unchallenged during cross­examination. ii) PW­2   is  Sh.   Dinesh   Kumar.     He   deposed   that   some quarrel had taken place between ... Testimony of this witness remained unchallenged during cross­examination. State Vs. Daulat Ram etc.        Page 7 of 11 (FIR No. 65/2015 PS Bhalaswa Dairy
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Ashok B Dani vs Sri P R Bhot on 25 February, 2022

Very interestingly, the complainant has not denied this specific defence. The cross-examination of complainant discloses that, he does not know anything about accused ... cross-examination. The evidence of accused remained unchallenged and his defence also remained unchallenged. During cross-examination, PW.1-complainant has not denied the defence
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 9 - R Badamikar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next