issued an order dated 19.07.2019, Annexure C-12, by substituting the earlier Order No.193 dated 15.07.2019 and according to the said order, the additional ... said DU to demolition was recorded through the official camcorder. The demolition drive was conducted in compliance to the order dated 06.01.2020 passed
further alleged that the Village Panchayat
issued demolition order against the said building which order has
been challenged by the OP No. 1 before Directorate ... demolition order until further orders, however,
the matter is still pending before the Directorate of Panchayat. It is a
fact that the demolition order
purchased the premises from the builder through a registered
agreement, the demolition order dated 02.08.2006 was passed.
5. Faced with imminent demolition, the Complainant filed ... against the
MVS+RRP
CC/14/25 Page 4 of 14
demolition order. The said suit was dismissed on 08.04.2011. It
is further alleged
period of thirty days from the date of issue of demolition orders. But the Directors of the Promoter Company did not take any action ... compliance of demolition order. Thereafter, on 17.09.2020 and 18.09.2020 this unauthorised construction has been demolished by GMADA and in this regard in EA/446/2017
period of thirty days from the date of issue of demolition orders. But the Directors of the Promoter Company did not take any action ... compliance of demolition order. Thereafter, on 17.09.2020 and 18.09.2020 this unauthorised construction has been demolished by GMADA and in this regard in EA/446/2017
period of thirty days from the date of issue of demolition orders. But the Directors of the Promoter Company did not take any action ... compliance of demolition order. Thereafter, on 17.09.2020 and 18.09.2020 this unauthorised construction has been demolished by GMADA and in this regard in EA/446/2017
period of thirty days from the date of issue of demolition orders. But the Directors of the Promoter Company did not take any action ... compliance of demolition order. Thereafter, on 17.09.2020 and 18.09.2020 this unauthorised construction has been demolished by GMADA and in this regard in EA/446/2017
period of thirty days from the date of issue of demolition orders. But the Directors of the Promoter Company did not take any action ... compliance of demolition order. Thereafter, on 17.09.2020 and 18.09.2020 this unauthorised construction has been demolished by GMADA and in this regard in EA/446/2017
period of thirty days from the date of issue of demolition orders. But the Directors of the Promoter Company did not take any action ... compliance of demolition order. Thereafter, on 17.09.2020 and 18.09.2020 this unauthorised construction has been demolished by GMADA and in this regard in EA/446/2017
period of thirty days from the date of issue of demolition orders. But the Directors of the Promoter Company did not take any action ... compliance of demolition order. Thereafter, on 17.09.2020 and 18.09.2020 this unauthorised construction has been demolished by GMADA and in this regard in EA/446/2017
