resort to the Court for relief by way of representative or derivative action is indeed very limited and is nowadays much less than before
forcing exclusive dealing
arrangements and misrepresenting the nature of business
contracts. Their actions restricted competition and
resulted in the financial downfall of Agua Wireless
Systems ... breaches of contract by Ashirvad
Pipes Private Limited that involve penalties.
Derivative Actions:
If Agua Wireless Systems Private Limited were a public
company, shareholders would
forcing exclusive dealing
arrangements and misrepresenting the nature of business
contracts. Their actions restricted competition and
resulted in the financial downfall of Agua Wireless
Systems ... breaches of contract by Ashirvad
Pipes Private Limited that involve penalties.
Derivative Actions:
If Agua Wireless Systems Private Limited were a public
company, shareholders would
punish contempt of itself is derived from Article 215 of the Constitution, the procedure for taking action is regulated by the provisions ... derived from and traceable only to Article 215 , and therefore a provision in an enactment made by the Legislature to regulate contempt actions cannot
contempt of subordinate Courts which is derived from the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act , is derived from Article 215 of the Constitution ... jurisdiction of the High Court to take action for contempt of subordinate Courts, which power is derived from the Act itself and if so construed
Smt. T.J. Manjamma W/O S. Yoga And Ors. ... vs State Of Karnataka By
discipline and cannot be regarded as misconduct justifying disciplinary action.
16. Mr. Ullal sought to derive support for his contention from certain observations
various Member Establishments and at Canara Bank and derived pecuniary benefit.
By his above action in causing issuance of the Cancard, in a fictitious name ... Canara Bank and derived pecuniary benefit. On the basis of these allegations, charge was levelled against the petitioner that by his action in causing issuance
business.
It has also made substantial profits from this action.
Therefore, the benefits derived by the assessee cannot be
called as capital in nature
Ayesha Hajeera Almas vs Chief Secretary on 15 March, 2022
Bench: Chief Justice , Krishna S