M/S Gujarat Pottling Co.Ltd. & Ors vs The Coca Cola Co. & Ors
Vatticherukuru Village Panchayat And ... vs Nori Vekatrama Deekshithulu And Ors on 26 April, 1991
Equivalent
6040/98, for vacating the ex parte ad interim injuction granted to the plaintiffs vide order dated July 1, 1998.
2. The two applications
caused to the opponent No. 1 if an interim injuction was not granted and the balance of convenience was in favour of the applicants ... elected against the legal rules and statutory provisions. If, therefore, an injuction is granted, the business of the company cannot be stopped
respondent continued the construction. On 8.5.1984 this Court vacated the injuction granted in W.P. No. 3392 of 1984. Thereafter, the 4th respondent applied
result, the Writ Petition is dismissed and the ad-interim injuction
granted by this Court
dismissing the said Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and vacating the interim injuction granted
both the suits the plaintiff filed an application for a temporary injuction market Ex. 5 in both the suits. The learned trial Judge passed ... suits. Therefore, the order of the learned trialJudge staying the adinterim injuction granted by him in both the suit is hereby set aside. The learned
dated
19.04.2017 of dismissal. He also urged for continuation of
interim injuction granted on 27.08.2015 and after preliminary
hearing, the notice had been issued
breach of injunction. (1) In the case of disobedience of any injuction granted or other order made under rule 1 or rule 2 or breach