registered sale deed dated
19.09.1964 which was registered on 28.10.1964.
Subsequently, the Khatha was changed in the name
of said Smt.Thangammal. After her death ... regularized the unauthorized
5
construction made by plaintiff. Thereafter, on
12.06.2000, Holder Khatha was issued by MCC
observing all formalities in favour of plaintiff
road. As per the
statements of the relative of the original
khatha holders of said land, open land was left
for making road. Therefore
khatha for the
legal representatives. The claims of the L.R.s can not be
better or worse than those of the original khatha-holder ... dispute that late K.Sundar is the khatha
holder in respect of the property in question as on
12.1.2002. Assuming that he was not entitled
unconverted properties, the khatha shall not be issued. It
is therefore contended on behalf of the respondents, the
khatha cannot be issued. It is also ... petitioner to seek for 'B'
khatha or holder khatha which would be issued by the
respondents. It is therefore contended that the prayer
conclusion that the
land granted in favour of earlier Khatha holders had fallen
barren for not having remitted the land revenue and this
land
case of the petitioner is that she is a
joint khatha holder in respect of property bearing Site
No.28, measuring
relief of permanent injunction in
respect of vacant site bearing Khatha No.534/8, old
No.480/165, situated at Chelur, Gubbi Taluk, bounded ... date of sale of the suit property,
Nirmala was the registered khatha holder in respect of the said
property.
3.3. Plaintiff filed number of applications
property.
The plaintiff has not challenged the said gift deed. The khatha in
respect of suit schedule 'A' property acquired under gift deed ... Mannoji Rao,
defendant No.1 is paying property tax as khatha holder of suit
schedule 'A' property.
12. It is the undisputed fact
establish his ownership of the property. Ex.D15
was the holder khatha which did not mention the name of
20
the defendant ... which is the khatha extract
merely showed the name as "holder".
18. In so far as the oral evidence on record,
though
khatha of
the said property in the name of the appellants and to show the
name of the appellants as the khatha holders ... request made by the appellants to
incorporate their name as the khatha holders of the said property,
ought to have been granted.
7. As rightly
