that khatha stands in the name of the
defendant i.e., holder khatha. On behalf of defendant, D.W.1 is
examined and nothing ... representation to the BDA for
cancellation of holder khatha and the property belongs to the
24
trust. The document of the year
property, but there is a
mistake in seeking for transfer of khatha on behalf of the
purchaser Smt.G.Vijaya Lakshmi i.e., the respondent ... documents reveals
that it is the signature of the earlier khatha holder and also the
owner and not purchaser. It appears that the petitioner
Nagaral (S.P.) and plaintiff Nos.1 to 3
are joint holders and owner in possession of land bearing
R.S.No.56 measuring ... joint holders and owners in possession of
the suit schedule properties. The defendants and their
ancestors are shown above the line in the Khatha
attorney
holder of all the family members of Siddamma i.e., defendant
Nos.1 to 21. Ever since the purchase, khatha has been affected
power of
attorney holder since they were not in a position to look
5
after and manage the schedule property and khatha of the
schedule
they have given an application to the Tahsildar,
Molakalmuru to change the khatha of the land bearing
Sy.Nos.44 and 207 in their names ... ordered to change
the khatha of Sy.Nos.44 and 207 without giving any notice to
the holder of rights in the names
they have given an application to the Tahsildar,
Molakalmuru to change the khatha of the land bearing
Sy.Nos.44 and 207 in their names ... ordered to change
the khatha of Sy.Nos.44 and 207 without giving any notice to
the holder of rights in the names
defendant and also with the connivance of the fourth
defendant got the khatha of the property changed to
their respective names, in spite of having ... Muniraju, who is stated to be the
general power of attorney holder of the first defendant
conveying the western half of the suit schedule property
general power of
attorney dated 09.07.2007 in favour of the present attorney
holder in respect of suit schedule property. The plaintiff also
produced the sale ... revenue
records cannot be transferred. Hence, the plaintiff approached
BBMP to issue khatha and the BBMP issued the khatha and
collected cash. It is contended
suit filed by the plaintiff, who is an
agreement holder and power of attorney holder, dated
16.12.2017 passed in O.S.No.191/2012 ... Village was granted to the plaintiff on
08.11.1978. As per the grant, khatha has been changed
in the name of the plaintiff and from
