possession, the same is denied by the
defendant. The GPA holder of the plaintiff was examined ... pavathi khatha was obtained by the
respondents/defendants. It is also the case of the plaintiff
that he is an agreement holder
1325/2021) is that the plaintiff
represented by the GPA holder, the father of the
plaintiff, it is alleged that the plaintiff filed suit ... which is a
portion of land bearing Sy.No.61/2, Revenue Khatha
6
No.154 situated at Horamavu-Agara village,
K.R.Puram Hobli
1325/2021) is that the plaintiff
represented by the GPA holder, the father of the
plaintiff, it is alleged that the plaintiff filed suit ... which is a
portion of land bearing Sy.No.61/2, Revenue Khatha
6
No.154 situated at Horamavu-Agara village,
K.R.Puram Hobli
Krishna, the defendant has purchased 3 sites from GPA
holders of one Ashwathappa through GPA holder
B.Venkatesh vide site No.3 khata No.1289 ... portion of the property purchased
from said Venkatesh who is a GPA holder of Ashwathappa
measuring 25 x 120 ft which is marked
absolute owner in possession of the
house property bearing khatha No.348/1 carved out of
former ... Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, Khatha No.197, Old
No. 492/13/1, presently bearing BBMP, Khatha No.
492/13/1/1, measuring East to West
schedule property for having purchased on
12.10.2009 executed by Chinnappa as GPA holder of
the Narayanappa, the father of the defendant DW1 and
thereafter ... agreement of sale
and received entire sale consideration. Thereafter, the
GPA holder executed the sale deed in favour of the
plaintiff. Such being the case
schedule property for having purchased on
12.10.2009 executed by Chinnappa as GPA holder of
the Narayanappa, the father of the defendant DW1 and
thereafter ... agreement of sale
and received entire sale consideration. Thereafter, the
GPA holder executed the sale deed in favour of the
plaintiff. Such being the case
already acted upon the GPA and
the action of the GPA holder is binding as the plaintiff.
Therefore, defendant No.3 is having right, title ... children
and they have accepted execution of all documents and
khatha also stands in the name of defendant No.3.
Defendant No.3 not only
Srinivasa Reddy and
Sri.Raghavednra Swamy. It is submitted that the GPA holders could
not have executed sale deeds in favour of defendant ... that the 12 sale deeds do not support
any documents such as Khatha, Tax Paid details or identification.
Therefore, possession of the schedule property with
process of law. The site Nos.2, 3 and 4 in khatha
No.121 are not at all in existence, the plaintiff claiming
right ... Ananda Rama Reddy, whose name was
notified represented by his GPA holder, who received
the award amount from the Special Land Acquisition
Officer (SPLO
