Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Sri. R. Mudlappa vs Sri. Ramanna on 29 February, 2020 IN THE COURT OF THE

registered sale deed dated 19.09.1964 which was registered on 28.10.1964. Subsequently, the Khatha was changed in the name of said Smt.Thangammal. After her death ... regularized the unauthorized 5 construction made by plaintiff. Thereafter, on 12.06.2000, Holder Khatha was issued by MCC observing all formalities in favour of plaintiff

respondent No.10 and further in the presence of all the khatha holders, phodi was done. Despite production of the documents before the Tribunal

from agriculture to non- agriculture purpose. Thereafter he obtained building plan and khatha from the competent authority by paying requisite fee, betterment charges ... capacity of the manager of their family and also as a khatha holder making assurance that he is the competent person to sell the said

that property bearing No.180, 15 O.S.No.8834/2014 having khatha No.180 was earlier situated within the limits of CMC, Mahadevapura. Subsequently ... these documents prima facie goes to show that plaintiff is khatha holder of schedule property. PW­1 in his evidence stated that schedule property

Khan who is the owner of property bearing No.30, V.P.Khatha No.1380, in Sy.No.52 of Malagal Village, Yeshwanthapur Hobli, Bangalore ... capacity of power of attorney holder entered into agreement to sell the property bearing No.30, V.P.Khatha No.1380

stating that the shop premises which were leased to the lease holders would be granted absolutely in their favour by collecting the market value ... claiming that he is the lease holder of the shop premises bearing Municipal khatha No.47/58 situated at Jail Field, B.M.Road, Hassan

suit schedule survey No.58, in the form of revenue sites, though Khatha was standing in the name of Ramakrishna Reddy. Taking advantage of this ... Khatha and the revenue authorities rightly rejected the same. 18. They further contend that the said Janardhan, as power of attorney holder, has sold

ExP1 to ExP21. The SPA holder of plaintiff in O.S.No.16453/2006 and also SPA holder of Defendant in O.S.No.6350 ... holder of his wife Irfana Sharif. That neither plaintiff is the owner of the property bearing site No.21, Khatha No.10/2A of Ambalipura

attorney holder/M.G.Rudresh of P.H.Suresh, in favour of Ramanujam, shows site No.1, in property bearing Khatha No. 33, assessment ... power of attorney holder/ Rudresh was 20 O.S.No.2857/2017 not authorised to sell site No.1, bearing Khatha No. 33, old assessment