City Corporation wherein it is stated that
corporation have not issued holder khatha to any persons in
respect of 2 acres 20 guntas of land ... admits that 65
applications were received for grant of holders khatha in
respect of Sy.No.167/1; Exhibit D-13 does not indicate
holders
preliminary notification
themselves stated that they are the joint khatha holders of
the land measuring about 18 acres. This is evident from
Annexures ... submits that
11
Sanjeevappa, H.Eraiah, Nagaraja and Galappa are separate
khatha holders. As per Rule 4(d), if two or more persons
jointly
favour by the owners of the property. In
that regard, the holder khatha has been granted in
favour of the petitioner. Presently, the petitioner ... said Power of
Attorney, the petitioner had sought for the holder khatha
based on her possession to the property and the same
been considered
that khatha stands in the name of the
defendant i.e., holder khatha. On behalf of defendant, D.W.1 is
examined and nothing ... representation to the BDA for
cancellation of holder khatha and the property belongs to the
24
trust. The document of the year
Pursuant to said sale deed khatha
has been made over to plaintiff's name as per khatha
certificate issued by BBMP ... attorney executed way back in the year 1995 plaintiff
had obtained holder khatha in the year 2004 i.e.,
18.10.2004 and she has been issued
document.
21. Mere revenue entries relating to the name of the
khatha holder or the extent cannot by themselves vest
indefeasible title over the subject
Sri Harish Kumar vs Prl. Secy. To Govt on 23 January, 2024
Bench: Chief Justice
Sri K S Surendra Babu vs The Prl Secy To Govt on 23 January, 2024
Sri. Harish Kumar vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 January, 2024
Bench: Chief Justice
Sri Harish Kumar vs Karnataka Institute Of Leather ... on 23 January, 2024
Bench: Chief Justice
