defendant to show cause quare
clausum querentis fregit. For every man's land is in the eye of the
law enclosed and set apart ... existing
only in the contemplation of law, as when one man's; land
adjoins to another's in the same field
held that the right to fish in another man's land fell within the section; and the principle of that cision was followed
take up the remaining branch of Mr. Sen's last contention : that in enacting Sub-section (2-A) 'ibid', the legislature ... pending on July 27, 1956 in no man's land, so to say, -- it is the duty of the legislature to step
respect of the land?
A.--Why should I spend all this money of my own-on another man's property? Subodh Mitter told ... otherwise why should I have built a house on another man's land.
11. This is the evidence which Gentle J. believed
s Prerogative in Saltpetre (1607) 12 Coke 12 that the King had a prerogative entitling him to enter into any man's land ... ground as possible; and consequently that the digging in a man's house, barn, out-house, etc., or weakening the walls of any such
injunction to compel the defendants to allow the plaintiff to use the land in this way. But the point was never made, until the matter ... That case decided that the license to go upon another man's land, unless coupled with a grant, was revocable at the will
s 10th Edition, 1947), in its widest
sense, includes a person's legal rights, of whatever description, that is,
a man's property ... constitutes his status or personal condition. In this sense a
man's land, chattels, shares and debts due to him are his property
alia, that land comprised in a Tea Garden retained by an intermediary under sub-section (1) read with sub-section (3) of S ... garden and the tea garden was reduced to a no-man's land.
36. According to the deponent, the corrct position was subsequently ascertained
with his men cut some Kalai from another man's land and thus dispossessed him: he complained and the land had to be given
they were canvassing that the suit properties were no man's land and the plaintiff/ petitioner was not the owner of the same ... right to canvas that the Suit properties were no man's land; nor they had any right to dispossess the plaintiff/petitioner ; nor they