order dated 28.10.2012.
35. Mr.Chagla contended that this is a motivated litigation filed
with an ulterior motive on account of the personal and vested ... Council.
36. In support of his contention that this is a proxy litigation on
behalf of one A.C. Muthiah, Mr, Chagla relied upon
which unequivocally indicated that the said
WP was nothing but a proxy litigation at the instance of the Respondent. That the
Ld. Sole Arbitrator ... aforesaid Judgement and Order was secured by the Respondent through its proxy
(Society) and thereby the Respondent has engaged in misrepresentation
Cricket Association Of Bihar vs The Board Of Control For Cricket In India ... on 11
Appeal.
5. Learned counsel for Petitioners submits that this is a
proxy litigation initiated on behalf of the tenants at the behest ... complaint/grievance made by
MLA therefore could not be termed as proxy litigation as sought to be
canvassed on behalf of Petitioners as being representative
Appeal.
5. Learned counsel for Petitioners submits that this is a
proxy litigation initiated on behalf of the tenants at the behest ... complaint/grievance made by
MLA therefore could not be termed as proxy litigation as sought to be
canvassed on behalf of Petitioners as being representative
Appeal.
5. Learned counsel for Petitioners submits that this is a
proxy litigation initiated on behalf of the tenants at the behest ... complaint/grievance made by
MLA therefore could not be termed as proxy litigation as sought to be
canvassed on behalf of Petitioners as being representative
Appeal.
5. Learned counsel for Petitioners submits that this is a
proxy litigation initiated on behalf of the tenants at the behest ... complaint/grievance made by
MLA therefore could not be termed as proxy litigation as sought to be
canvassed on behalf of Petitioners as being representative
Section 498(A) of the IPC.
13) The history of civil litigation between the complainant and
Virendra on one side and the Petitioners ... litigations involve property disputes. The F.I.R. clearly
discloses a proxy litigation engaged by Virendra through his wife
slum dwellers
deliberately prevented Petitioner from implementing the project
through a proxy litigation initiated by rival developers M/s. S.L.K
Housing Developer ... rival developer.
This Committee is further of view that the proxy litigation brought
before this Committee by rival developer M/s. S.L.K Housing
slum dwellers
deliberately prevented Petitioner from implementing the project
through a proxy litigation initiated by rival developers M/s. S.L.K
Housing Developer ... rival developer.
This Committee is further of view that the proxy litigation brought
before this Committee by rival developer M/s. S.L.K Housing
