Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Petition in W.P.(MD)No.14600 of 2017 is a proxy litigation by giving the brand name "Public Interest Litigation". This Writ

commercial contract matter. This, in our view, is nothing but a proxy litigation indulged in by the petitioner ... interested litigants, making the W.P.No.28303 of 2010 a proxy litigation. 22. Now, falling back to the other aspects urged on either side

personal gain or private profit either of themselves or as a proxy of others or for any other extraneous motivation or for glare of publicity ... impression about oblique motives involved, and in most  11 cases shows proxy litigation. Where the petitioner has not even a remote link with the issues

personal gain or private profit either of themselves or as a proxy of others or for any other extraneous motivation or for glare of publicity ... gives impression about oblique motives involved, and in most cases shows proxy litigation. Where the petitioner has not even a remote link with the issues

fact a family dispute was pending which was the result of the litigation including the one started by P. D. Kothari in seeking for rectification ... cousin brothers was the backbone of the litigation and it is not a proxy fight but it is a direct fight between two cousin brothers

personal gain or private profit either of themselves or as a proxy of others or for any other extraneous motivation or for glare of publicity ... queue muffing their faces by wearing the mask of public interest litigation and get into the Courts by filing vexatious and http://www.judis

personal gain or private profit either of themselves or as a proxy of others or for any other extraneous motivation or for glare of publicity ... gives impression about oblique motives involved, and in most cases shows proxy litigation. Where the petitioner has not even a remote link with the issues

surroundings. It does appear to us that this is a possible proxy litigation since the land is now sought to be utilised for the lower

consensus between the petitioner and the 1 st respondent. b) Proxy Litigation 61. It is the submission of the learned Addl. Solicitor General that these ... extraordinary jurisdiction, through the instant petition, which is nothing but a proxy litigation as what could not be achieved by the 2nd respondent before

Even according to the facts of these cases, it is a proxy litigation, viz., by sub lessee. To put it differently, these reported cases