Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Abhimanyu Sharda Son Of Narayan Sharda vs The State Of Rajasthan on 12 January, 2022

question and the present petition has been filed as a proxy litigation, which should not be entertained. The learned ASG Mr. Narsimha submitted that ... this common petition filed by the petitioners is nothing but a proxy litigation, filed to protect the vested interest of some third parties

Amar Prem And Sons vs The State Of Rajasthan on 12 January, 2022 Author: Inderjeet

reason to believe that the petition has been filed as proxy litigation at the instance of respondent No. 3 to frustrate the recovery proceedings against ... suppressing material facts by not producing the vital documents, and as proxy litigation at the instance of the respondent No. 3 , with a view

considered view that the review petitioners have unnecessarily protracted the litigation. On perusal of the sale deed and revenue records, it is evident that Ladu ... right, whatsoever, in the property in question and it is a proxy litigation on behalf of purchasers to whom they sold the property, pending litigation

considered view that the review petitioners have unnecessarily protracted the litigation. On perusal of the sale deed and revenue records, it is evident that Ladu ... right, whatsoever, in the property in question and it is a proxy litigation on behalf of purchasers to whom they sold the property, pending litigation

considered view that the review petitioners have unnecessarily protracted the litigation. On perusal of the sale deed and revenue records, it is evident that Ladu ... right, whatsoever, in the property in question and it is a proxy litigation on behalf of purchasers to whom they sold the property, pending litigation

Counsel for respondents submits that instant petition is nothing but a proxy litigation at the behest of M/s Genus Power Infrastructure Ltd who claimed ... have come forward at the behest of successful bidder (Genus) as proxy litigation. Counsel further submits that once recommendations have been made by BIFR

This link establishes, argued the AAG that this petition is a proxy litigation by the petitioner No.1 for M/s Sonika Corporation Private Limited

establishes, counsel submitted, that the present petition is malafide and mere proxy litigation for Durgesh Kumari. In rejoinder Mr. Ravi Chirania, submitted that the dismissal