also the say of the respondent that even the
proxy litigation for and on behalf of the third party
must not be entertained ... only remedy available for such a proxy litigation
is the election petition to be filed by the aggrieved
party and affected person
process of law and courts by
essentially what is a proxy litigation.
13. In R. Unnikrishnan and another (supra), it was observed as
follows
respondent No.2 on
30.04.1993 and the present appeal is a proxy litigation on behalf of
respondent No.2. It is the contention of respondent
personal gain or private profit either of
themselves or as a proxy of others or for any other
extraneous motivation or for glare of publicity ... gives
impression about oblique motives involved, and in most
cases shows proxy litigation. Where the petitioner has
not even a remote link with the issues
just another
example of Anand Datwani using Jamna Datwani to file proxy
litigation against Janak Datwani in order to pressurize him into
accepting Anand Datwani
personal
gain or private profit either of themselves or as a proxy of others or for
any other extraneous motivation or for glare of publicity ... gives impression about oblique motives involved,
and in most cases shows proxy litigation. Where the petitioner has not
even a remote link with the issues
petitioner is
with an oblique motive and is nothing but a proxy litigation
at the behest of unknown hands and initiated with a sole
purpose
Upon perusal of the averments made in the public interest litigation and documents appended thereto, the petitioner seeks direction declaring the appointment of respondent ... gives impression about oblique motives involved, and in most cases shows proxy litigation. Where the petitioner has not even a remote link with the issues
quashed.
6. Upon perusal of the averments made in the public interest litigation and documents appended thereto, the petitioner seeks direction cancelling the appointment ... gives impression about oblique motives involved, and in most cases shows proxy litigation. Where the petitioner has not even a remote link with the issues
some one else other than the plaintiff has
indulged in a proxy litigation.
20. PW1 in his chief examination stated that the
original Will
