vehemently urged that on the representation of the plaint by the plaintiff after it was returned to him for proper presentation pursuant to the order ... plaint if any amendment is made by the plaintiff in the plaint and represents it, it is really a fresh plaint which the court
paid and
the plaint was represented on 9.10.1998. After having received
the plaint, the court itself returned the plaint with a
direction, directing the plaintiff ... able to see that the court itself
returned the plaint for representation for filing an application
under Section 149 CPC and the same was also
TLNJ 37), this Court, while considering the delay in representation the plaint held that, "there was a delay on the part of the plaintiffs ... Court was satisfied with the plaintiffs explanation and accepted the plaint on representation after excusing the delay. This civil revision petition has been brought
plaint was once again returned with certain objections.
On 09-04-2004, the plaint was once again represented (3rd representation)
with an application to condone ... representing the plaint and
making good the deficit court-fee, therefore, the plaint ought
to have been rejected;
(3) The delay in representation was condoned
that the wrong Court has no jurisdiction while rejecting the plaint for the representation to proper Court to enlarge the period of limitation ... time under section 14 should stop with the return of the plaint for representation to the proper court. This decision is of no assistance
deemed to have been instituted on the date of representation of the amended plaint which the Court had jurisdiction to accept and was, therefore, barred ... that case their Lordships held that representation of a plaint in accordance with the order of the former Court before a Court of competent jurisdiction
representation was made sometime in January 1955. The representation was made to the petitioner. The respondents 2, 3 and 4 made the representations. The representation ... gulf of difference between the representation mentioned in the plaint and the representation made on the Ashirbad day, as to time when it was made
follows:
?14.The time granted by the court for the representation of the
plaint, is only an administrative order and not a judicial order ... such, if there is any delay in the representation of the plaint, an
application to excuse the said delay could be filed under Section
time granted by the court for the representation of the
plaint, is only an administrative order and not a judicial order, and as
such ... there is any delay in the representation of the plaint, an
application to excuse the said delay could be filed under Section
Srikalahasthi has no power to grant 15 days time for representation of the plaint in the proper Court, since there is no power ... grant time. Even if the wrong Court grants time for representation of the plaint before a proper Court, it will not save the period
