relevant to questions of civil right
such as an alleged interference with the Plaintiffs rights
to worship on the hill, and in that case ... indicated that they would press their rights in a Civil
Court. Once the right of worship of the Digamberies is
established there is little doubt
plaintiffs have got no proprietory right not any right to restrain Digambers in exercising their right of worship and for proper establishment of their right ... sects have got any right over the said of Parasnath hill except that of right of worship in the shrines, tonks and Mandirs
right to darshan and pooja of the Deities. They have every right to file a suit to protect and preserve the right to practice their ... being a fundamental right, is a civil right within the meaning of Section 9 of the Code. A violation of that right guaranteed under Article
necessary incident to the decision of civil rights. It is well established that a right to worship in a particular temple ...is a civil right ... relevant to questions of civil right such as an alleged interference with the plaintiffs rights to worship on the hill, and in that case
Northern Cult:-
● Right to recite Manthra in praise of their own Guru Vedanta Desika
is part of fundamental right to worship available to the Members ... Constitution of India declaring Adhiapaka Mirasi
right of Southern Cult runs contrary to right to worship/freedom of
religion available to the Members of Northern
Right to recite Manthra in praise of their own Guru Vedanta
Desika is part of fundamental right to worship available to the
Members ... Constitution of India declaring Adhiapaka Mirasi
right of Southern Cult runs contrary to right to worship/freedom
of religion available to the Members of Northern
question whether a right of user of "land or water" covered the right to worship in a temple. This conflict was _jesolved ... Additional District Magistrate were therefore, right in negativing the contention of the present applicants that the right to worship the idol of Devi Padmawati flowed
statute as a whole is on the grounds of secularism, right to equality and right to freedom of religion. Challenge to the acquisition ... disputed site resulting in interruption of even the undisputed right of worship of Hindus within that area is being ignored. It is also contended that
properties were
bound by a trust in favour of those who worship God
according to faith, doctrine, disciple of Jacobite Syrian
Church in the communion ... between two persons one,
Abdul Messiah and other Abdulla-II over the right to be
Patriarch. Both of them were appointed by Firman
both the rights. If the
denominational rights are such that to give effect to
them would substantially reduce the right conferred ... after giving effect to the
rights of the denomination what is left to the public
of the right of worship is something substantial
