Code (corresponding to section 311 of the new Code.) but there
was no discussion whether an order passed under section 311
... under section 311 Cr.P.C. but I find no discussion on the issue
as to whether an order passed under section 311
application u/s 311
Cr.P.C., were interlocutory orders and as such, the
revision against those orders was clearly barred ... under Section 311
Cr.P.C. is purely an interlocutory order and a revision
against an interlocutory order is clearly barred under
Section
under
Section 311 Cr.P.C. is an interlocutory order and the revision against
such an order is specifically barred under Section ... also perused the order passed by the revisional Court
holding that the order passed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. is
interlocutory order and therefore
interlocutory order.
18. According to Section 397(2) CrPC, revision against an interlocutory
order is not maintainable. It is well settled that ... order summoning or refusing to summon witnesses u/s 311
CrPC is an interlocutory order within the meaning of Sec. 397(2) CrPC
application under Section 311 either way is an interlocutory order and therefore, it is not revisable in terms of Section 397 ... under Section 311 Cr.P.C., were interlocutory orders and as such, the revision against those orders was clearly barred under Section 397(2)
under Section 311 CrPC, were interlocutory orders and as such, the revision against those orders was clearly barred under Section 397(2) CrPC ... other on the application under Section 311 CrPC for recalling the witness, were the orders of interlocutory nature, in which case, under Section
order passed under Section 311 of Cr.PC is an interlocutory order and revision petition is not maintainable against interlocutory order. No citation from ... order or no provision of law has been discussed to hold that an order passed under Section 311 of Cr.PC is an interlocutory order
Section 311 of Cr.P.C. is interlocutory in nature and it is
well settled of principle of law that against the interlocutory order, revision ... under Section
311 Cr.P.C., were interlocutory orders and as such,
t he revision against those orders was clearly barred
under Section
examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C. is an
interlocutory order and the revision against such an order is barred under
Section ... under Section 311 Cr.P.C., were interlocutory orders and as such, the
revision against those orders was clearly barred under Section 397(2)
application u/s 311 Cr.P.C., were interlocutory orders and as such,
the revision against those orders was clearly barred ... under Section 311 Cr.P.C. is purely
an interlocutory order and a revision against an interlocutory order is clearly
barred under Section
