petitioners dated 20.11.2007 for carrying out survey as per
the supplementary sethwar issued in the year 1958 in respect
of land situated ... India
and to survey the said land as per the supplementary sethwar
issued in the year
records were examined and it was found that sub-
division and supplementary sethwar were not done in respect of
Survey ... learned Assistant
Government Pleader for Revenue that sub-division and
supplementary sethwar are not available and as per paragraph No.5
of the circular
According to the respondents that in 1331-Fasali (1921 AD), Supplementary Sethwar was issued creating ... were created. In 1346-Fasli, a supplimentary Sethwar was issued deleting S.Nos.129/1 to 129/10. S.No.I29/l was renumbered
passing on title to them) was shown as protected tenant. In the
Sethwar for the year 1351 Fasli of Bomraspet village, the subject
land
said Nooruddin did not deposit Rs. 87/- after the issue of supplementary sethwar. While assigning lands Laoni rules were not followed, and the assignee Nooruddin
petitioner Raees Mirza
(petitioner no.9) that as per the Sethwar of 1963, land in Sy.Nos.285
and 294 are recorded as patta lands ... that the land in the said Sy.Nos. is recorded in the
Sethwar as patta land belonging to Mansoor Ali Shah, the grandfather
petitioner Raees Mirza
(petitioner no.9) that as per the Sethwar of 1963, land in Sy.Nos.285
and 294 are recorded as patta lands ... that the land in the said Sy.Nos. is recorded in the
Sethwar as patta land belonging to Mansoor Ali Shah, the grandfather
interruption till today. The claim of the
petitioner is based on the sethwar of 1343 Fasli according
the which the Nawab Fasih Jung Bahadur along
Ananthareddiguda Village which
is also Government land. The Supplementary Sethwar
entered might have been for an extent of Ac.9-39 gts.,
without verifying
District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, wherein he
noted that as per the Sethwar, Khasra pahani and the occupancy rights
granted by the Revenue Divisional Officer
