alleged that the
petitioners have refused to return the
'Streedhan' of his daughter. The respondent
No.2 has further alleged that ... will remarry. The
respondent No.2 has also alleged that the
'Streedhan' of his daughter was handed over
to her in-laws
2013 CAV JUDGMENT
as well as Streedhan properties. Such application was filed on
08.10.2012. On the same day respondent-wife has also filed one
complaint ... whereby the petitioner was directed to
handover the Streedhan properties to the respondent-wife and to pay
him Rs.2,000/- per month towards maintenance
alleged that the accused
persons were entrusted/were having dominion over the streedhan articles
of complainant and all of them committed criminal breach of trust ... State Vs. Jignesh & Ors. 7/14
jewelery and streedhan articles alongwith her and she stated that she had
settled the matter with
lodging an FIR
and when police has legally empowered to recover those Streedhan articles in course of
investigation, the question of moving a court invoking ... totally an abuse of process of court. He contended that those Streedhan
articles not being the stolen properties, the learned Magistrate has no authority
recorded in the name of her mother,
Sita Pradhan, which were her streedhan properties and the rest are the
ancestral properties of her father, Prahalad ... exclusive
possession over the same. Sita Pradhan had no Streedhan Properties, but
some properties were purchased in her name by Prahalad, out of the
income
Respondent on or before 30.6.2014.
b. The ornaments and other ‘streedhan’ of the Respondent
which has been seized by the Police and are lying ... Petitioner seized by the Police
which of course will not include streedhan shall be
returned to the Petitioner like Laptop, Mobile Phone,
Digital Camera
entrustment.
As such, there is no evidence of entrustment of the
streedhan to any accused. There is no evidence of
any demand of return ... streedhan from them by the
complainant. There is no evidence of refusal to
return the streedhan articles are their
misappropriation or conversion by accused persons
entrustment. As such, there is no
evidence of entrustment of the streedhan to accused.
There is no evidence of any demand of return of
streedhan ... from them. There is no evidence of refusal to
return the streedhan articles are their misappropriation
or conversion by accused persons. In these
circumstances
their common intention committed
criminal breach of trust in respect of the streedhan
articles thereby committing offence punishable u/s
406/34 IPC . A complaint ... entrustment.
As such, there is no evidence of entrustment of the
streedhan to any accused. There is no evidence of
refusal to return the streedhan
entrustment. As such, there is no evidence of
entrustment of the streedhan to accused. There is no
evidence of any demand of return of streedhan ... from them.
There is no evidence of refusal to return the streedhan
articles are their misappropriation or conversion by accused
persons. In these circumstances
