account the provisions of Rule 46 of the 2017
Rules and the provisions of Rules 51 of the 2002 Rules would not apply ... evidence introduced by the Trademarks Rules, 2017,
would apply retrospectively to proceedings initiated under the Trademarks
Rules, 2002.
ii) Whether failure to file evidence
under
Classes 29 and 30 of the Fourth Schedule to the Trademark Rules, 2002
inasmuch as such use allegedly amounts to infringement of the plaintiff ... proprietor of the
registered trademark ‗EVEREST' in classes 29 and 30 of the Fourth
Schedule to the Trademark Rules 2002 under a deed
evidence introduced by the
Trademarks Rules, 2017, would apply retrospectively to
proceedings initiated under the Trademarks Rules, 2002.
ii) Whether failure to file evidence ... 2002
Rules.
6. The learned Judge in Mahesh Gupta construed Rule 158 of the
2017 Rules, and in terms of which the 2002 Rules came
evidence introduced by the
Trademarks Rules, 2017, would apply retrospectively to
proceedings initiated under the Trademarks Rules, 2002.
ii) Whether failure to file evidence ... 2002
Rules.
6. The learned Judge in Mahesh Gupta construed Rule 158 of the
2017 Rules, and in terms of which the 2002 Rules came
been pending since long and had also been initiated under
Trademark Rules 2002, when no time limit on the number of adjournments
were contemplated under ... 2002 Rules,
the Registrar had the power to allow extension of time and adjournment under
Rules 56 and 105 of the Trademark Rules, 2002 read
been pending since long and had also been initiated under
Trademark Rules 2002, when no time limit on the number of adjournments
were contemplated under ... 2002 Rules,
the Registrar had the power to allow extension of time and adjournment under
Rules 56 and 105 of the Trademark Rules, 2002 read
been pending since long and had also been initiated under
Trademark Rules 2002, when no time limit on the number of adjournments
were contemplated under ... 2002 Rules,
the Registrar had the power to allow extension of time and adjournment under
Rules 56 and 105 of the Trademark Rules, 2002 read
been pending since long and had also been initiated under
Trademark Rules 2002, when no time limit on the number of adjournments
were contemplated under ... 2002 Rules,
the Registrar had the power to allow extension of time and adjournment under
Rules 56 and 105 of the Trademark Rules, 2002 read
been pending since long and had also been initiated under
Trademark Rules 2002, when no time limit on the number of adjournments
were contemplated under ... 2002 Rules,
the Registrar had the power to allow extension of time and adjournment under
Rules 56 and 105 of the Trademark Rules, 2002 read
been pending since long and had also been initiated under
Trademark Rules 2002, when no time limit on the number of adjournments
were contemplated under ... 2002 Rules,
the Registrar had the power to allow extension of time and adjournment under
Rules 56 and 105 of the Trademark Rules, 2002 read
