decide the
applications made by the Petitioner for protection as a
whistleblower as per the Resolution dated 21.04.2004
bearing No.371/12/2002 ... over the complaint as envisaged under the Circular
for protection as a whistleblower as per the circular
No.12/09/18 dated 28.09.2018, within
Mehsana District Cooperative Milk ... vs Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, ... on 6 November, 2020
Author: A
Sonani Industries Pvt Ltd vs Prime Diamond Tech on 8 April, 2024
Author: Biren Vaishnav
Rohini Singh vs State Of Gujarat & on 8 January, 2018
Author: J.B.Pardiwala
Rohini Singh vs State Of Gujarat & on 8 February, 2018
Author: J.B.Pardiwala
were the
members themselves of the very cooperative society and were the
whistleblowers at whose instance, the show cause notice was initiated
and therefore
manufacture products such as cosmetics, oral care products
and the like. The whistleblower Jagdish Patel, PTRC's head visited
Naina Gajjar's home
manufacture products such as cosmetics, oral care products
and the like. The whistleblower Jagdish Patel, PTRC's head visited
Naina Gajjar's home
also contended that the petitioner was
the only a whistleblower and she filed an
application, which is considered by the
scrutiny committee. It was contended
information
has been pleaded on the basis of the information received
through whistleblowers in the various departments of the
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation as well
