consideration of this Bill.
Sir, even in Ancient India, the concept of ‘whistleblower’ was in existence. Kautilya proposed:
“Any informant (súchaka) who supplies information about ... framing this law.
Sir, very succinctly I can say this. One noted whistleblower said:
“My chief told me that I was not loyal
Justices K S Radhakrishnan and
Arjan Kumar Sikri ruled that identity of whistleblower can never be revealed to the
accused facing prosecution under Prevention ... petitioner."
(http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SCCanttellaccusedwhowhistleblower
is/articleshow/21987081.cms). The Supreme Court was right in denying this
Justices K S Radhakrishnan and
Arjan Kumar Sikri ruled that identity of whistleblower can never be revealed to the
accused facing prosecution under Prevention ... petitioner."
(http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SCCanttellaccusedwhowhistleblower
is/articleshow/21987081.cms). The Supreme Court was right in denying this
initial years until
2013 (which are the subject of the whistleblower's
letter) may need a detailed review by SEBI or an
investigation agency ... statutory
recognition of what are called 'whistleblowers', to attempt to deny
the undeniable. To say that there must be material from which
recommend disciplinary action against those respondents responsible for harassing the whistleblower applicant, as provided for in the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 and CCS (Conduct) Rules ... recommend disciplinary action against those respondents responsible for harassing the whistleblower applicant, as provided for in the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 and CCS (Conduct) Rules
Seema Sapra vs General Electric Co. & Ors. on 2 March, 2015
Author: S. Ravindra
such wrong. They have a duty to protect the
identity of the whistleblower, especially a serious complaint was made against corruption in
the hospital ... this further reiterated by Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2011 and the
Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers (PIDPI) Resolution
[http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal
Raksha Jindal vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 5 March, 2015
Author: Siddharth Mridul
Bench
that the aforesaid order is quite vindictive as he has been a whistleblower in the department and he had brought various financial and other irregularities
into motion and played the role of whistleblowers against a public servant who were allegedly indulged in manipulating the record pertaining to the Government property
